Churchill protests lifting Bagan ban, shots off letter to AIFF

January 17, 2013 07:36 pm | Updated June 15, 2016 10:46 pm IST - New Delhi

Goan giants Churchill Brothers on Thursday, shot off a letter to AIFF president Praful Patel, protesting the parent body’s decision to revoke Mohun Bagan’s two-year suspension from the I-League. File photo: Ritu Raj Konwar

Goan giants Churchill Brothers on Thursday, shot off a letter to AIFF president Praful Patel, protesting the parent body’s decision to revoke Mohun Bagan’s two-year suspension from the I-League. File photo: Ritu Raj Konwar

Goan giants Churchill Brothers on Thursday, shot off a letter to AIFF president Praful Patel, protesting the parent body’s decision to revoke Mohun Bagan’s two-year suspension from the I-League, and termed it a violation of the “process of natural justice and fair play“.

The AIFF, during its executive committee meeting on January 15, had revoked its earlier decision to ban Mohun Bagan for two years for withdrawing the team in wake of crowd trouble during the December 9 Kolkata derby against East Bengal.

Churchill Brothers supremo Churchill Alemao raised nine points in a three-page letter to Patel, which is in possession of PTI.

One of the point stated, “Giving an unfair chance to reschedule the Mohun Bagan matches during the period of suspension is tantamount to discarding the suspension which has not been found to be illegal by the Executive Committee, which in fact agreed that Mohun Bagan had violated the relevant provisions of I-league regulations.”

Alemao has been forthright in mentioning that “Rescheduling Mohun Bagan’s matches will only provide additional advantage to Mohun Bagan, when actually they should be penalised. The team will use the priod of inactivity as a bonus, as the rest has provided opportunity to the players to increase fitness levels.Mohun Bagan had four players in the injured list who would not be available for the subsequent matches. Now they are fully fit.....”

Alemao termed the decision “shocking” and questioned as to how the executive committee arrived at a conclusion.

“Any punishment or waiver ought to be backed by relevant rules. While the Core Committee as well as the One-Man Inquiry Commission pointed to the relevant Rule, the Executive Committee has not ascribed any rule or provision in arriving at the shocking decision on January 15, thus violating the process of natural justice and fair play. Any order has to be ’speaking order’”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.