Srinivasan, 12 cricketers named in Mudgal panel report: SC

April 16, 2014 01:46 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 07:29 pm IST - New Delhi

The Supreme Court said on Wednesday that “Any probe into allegations made by the Mudgal committee against 13 people, including N. Srinivasan, should be done by BCCI itself to maintain its institutional autonomy.” File photo

The Supreme Court said on Wednesday that “Any probe into allegations made by the Mudgal committee against 13 people, including N. Srinivasan, should be done by BCCI itself to maintain its institutional autonomy.” File photo

The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to allow N. Srinivasan to function as Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) president so long as the probe into IPL betting and spot-fixing allegations is going on.

A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Ibrahim Kalifulla said there were 12 allegations against Mr. Srinivasan, who has been named along with 12 prominent cricketers, in the report of Justice Mudgal Committee submitted to the apex court in a sealed cover.

"It [report] said all these allegations were brought to his [Mr. Srinivasan's] notice but he did not take any action. That means he was aware of the allegations and did not take them seriously. Mr. Srinivasan's name was the 13th and he had 12 allegations against him. He can't become BCCI president as long as the probe is on,” Justice Patnaik told senior counsel Aryama Sundaram, appearing for the BCCI.

Mr. Sundaram had urged the court to allow Mr. Srinivasan to discharge his functions as the BCCI president as there was nothing in the probe panel's report against him.

The Bench said it was not inclined to order a CBI or an SIT probe as it would sully the image of cricketers and undermine the autonomy of the cricket board.

"Having come to know the nature of allegations, we cannot close our eyes. We are not considering an SIT probe because we don't want the CBI or the police or the media to throw mud on cricketers. Reputations of cricketers and great names are at stake. What happens to the reputation of the players who are representing the country and Indian cricketers of the future? Cricket has to be clean, but institutional autonomy has to be maintained," Justice Patnaik said.

Taking note of a communication from Sunil Gavaskar, the interim president for IPL-7, asking the court to take a decision on whether IPL Chief Operating Officer Sundar Raman should continue or not, the Bench said in the interest of the game it was allowing Mr. Raman to continue to function as COO of IPL-7, which began on Wednesday in Abu Dhabi.

The Bench asked the BCCI and Mr. Srinivasan to respond by April 22 on how the probe should be conducted into the allegations. It also agreed to hear the BCCI’s plea seeking tapes of audio recording of interactions of the Mudgal committee members with Indian skipper M.S. Dhoni and Mr. Srinivasan. It asked the committee to appoint an amicus to assist the court and to make his submissions on the request of the BCCI.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.