Maintaining firmly that his “conscience is clear,” new ICC chairman N. Srinivasan on Thursday said he has “done nothing to tarnish the image of the game” and will speak out once the Probe Committee headed by Justice (Retd.) Mukul Mudgal tables the final report.
“Let the report come out and I will speak. At this point, I am at a disadvantage. I would like to say one thing. My conscience is clear. I have not done anything to tarnish the game, bring disrepute or done anything wrong. I do hope that this will come out cleanly. When there is something before he court, I don’t want to say anything more,” Mr. Srinivasan said.
Mr. Srinivasan reiterated that he has himself “stepped aside” from functioning as the BCCI president and does not interfere or intervene in its activities.
“I have stepped aside and I don’t have a habit of going inside and poking my nose,” he told NDTV .
He was sarcastic when asked about the never-ending controversy of his “conflict of interest.”
“What is conflict of interest? This is now going on for many years.”
Mr. Srinivasan said that it will be difficult for him to answer a question as to how it feels to be ICC chairman despite such legal hassles.
“Difficult question to answer now that it’s all over. The attempts that were made in some quarters didn’t succeed and other members of the ICC reposed faith in BCCI and me. As a result, election was unanimous. So in hindsight, it’s difficult for me to say what was going through my mind at that time,” he said.
In depth:>IPL scandal
The supremo of India Cements, which owns the high-profile Chennai Super Kings, feels that he is at a “disadvantageous position” as some matters are still pending on court.
“I am at a disadvantage as some matters are still pending in court. That’s why I am not able to speak freely.”
Mr. Srinivasan sought to downplay the negative reports in the western media about his appointment for ICC top job.
“Look at it the other way. This is what the newspapers say. So I can’t fight the media. That’s a perception. A headline that is given. Even some people said that I was barred. Actually, I had voluntarily stepped aside. What is important is that you have got to look forward to.”
Mr. Srinivasan defended ICC’s Anti-Corruption & Security Unit (ACSU) stating that they are doing “significant amount” of but have a few bottlenecks as they can’t act like a law-enforcement agency.
“I don’t think ICC has failed to do it. In fact, ICC has stepped up the vigil. I think an important aspect in the whole issue is that there has been lot of efforts to educate players as to what extent approaches can be made. In fact I understand that the players have started to report more about approaches.
“The slightest approach is being reported. So I can surely say that ICC’s efforts are paying off. ACSU is being kept informed and players are being counselled,” he said.
Mr. Srinivasan then highlighted the problems of ACSU.
“ACSU is not a police force. It does not have the powers that law enforcement agencies have. But they have an understanding with more and more police forces around the world for exchange of information so that they can do their job a little better. It’s an ongoing process.”
Mr. Srinivasan said that at the next ICC board meeting, the ‘Code of Ethics’ will be “updated and strengthened.”
The ICC chairman once again justified why BCCI was right in demanding greater share of the ICC pie but also explained that other boards will stand to gain more from the new revamped ICC revenue model.
“For almost 70 years, two countries England and Australia have had a veto. It’s only in the late 90’s, it’s changed. The impression that power is vested within three countries is not quite correct. It’s just that three countries will assume greater responsibility.
Mr. Srinivasan gave a detailed explanation as to how BCCI is justified in demanding a larger chunk of the revenue.
“In fact, India has been contributing a very significant part of that revenue. It’s around 75-80 per cent. However as per the new model going around for eight year cycle 2015-2023, all countries will get more than what they got during the last cycle. This is expected that India will get a bit more of the share recognizing its contribution.
“I don’t think there’s anything wrong in that. India will be getting 21-22 per cent compared to 3-4 per cent, it was getting earlier. India is not taking all it brings to the table. India is fair and the perception needs to change,” he added.
