Jadeja penalised

July 25, 2014 04:43 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 05:31 pm IST - Southampton

Ravindra Jadeja shakes hands with James Anderson after running him out to win the test match on the fifth day of the second cricket test match between England and India at Lord's cricket ground.

Ravindra Jadeja shakes hands with James Anderson after running him out to win the test match on the fifth day of the second cricket test match between England and India at Lord's cricket ground.

Ravindra Jadeja has been found guilty of a Level 1 violation of the ICC Code of Conduct and was fined 50 per cent of his match fee following a hearing chaired by match referee David Boon on Thursday.

Following India’s Level 3 violation charge levelled against James Anderson for allegedly pushing the Indian all-rounder during the first Test at Trent Bridge, England laid a counter-charge for a Level 2 breach against Jadeja.

The ICC had subsequently appointed Boon to adjudicate Jadeja’s case. Thursday’s hearing lasted 150 minutes, during which Boon cross examined the two players.

The hearing was attended by both the players, their legal counsels, witnesses as well as BCCI’s M.V. Sridhar, Phil Neale and Paul Downton of the ECB, and the ICC’s Ethics & Regulatory Lawyer.

After listening to the players’ statements, cross examination of witnesses by ECB counsel Kendrah Potts and Jadeja’s counsel Jonathan Ellis and watching video footage, Boon found him not guilty of the original charge but “guilty under Article 2.1.8, that relates to conduct contrary to the spirit of the game,” according to an ICC press release.

The BCCI expressed its reservations against the judgement. “The BCCI wishes to make it clear that it is not satisfied with the verdict. The BCCI reserves its right to appeal against the sentence. The BCCI believes that Ravindra Jadeja was not at fault, and supports him fully,” the release declared.

The ICC release specified that “a decision in respect of a first Level 1 offence is non-appealable and shall remain the full and final decision in relation to the matter.”

Second offence, but… Though this is a second offence by Jadeja under the Level 1 ambit, the code under which he was earlier found guilty was 2.1.4 while the latest is under the 2.1.8 clause, and hence there is ambiguity on whether the BCCI is eligible to appeal.

The first Level 1 violation pertained to Jadeja’s abusive language against Australia’s Shane Watson in a One-Day International.

Meanwhile, ‘the Anderson case’ will be heard by judicial commissioner, Gordon Lewis, on August 1.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.