Afridi no longer a captaincy material for PCB: Butt

July 08, 2011 11:45 am | Updated November 17, 2021 01:21 am IST - Karachi

File photo of Pakistan Cricket Board's  Chairman, Ijaz Butt

File photo of Pakistan Cricket Board's Chairman, Ijaz Butt

The Chairman of the PCB, Ijaz Butt has made it clear that the former Pakistan One-day skipper Shahid Afridi is no longer a captaincy material for the PCB.

“As far as I am concerned, Afridi is no longer a captaincy material for the PCB,” Ijaz Butt told the ‘Geo Super’ channel in an interview last night.

“In my opinion, which may be considered by some people as wrong, he (Afridi) was responsible for us losing the last two One-day Internationals in the West Indies,” he added.

The much publicised conflict between Afridi and the Board started when the PCB Chairman removed the flamboyant all-rounder as captain of the national One-day team for the series against Ireland in May, although he was retained in the side as a player.

The decision to remove Afridi was taken on basis of a report from team manager Intikhab Alam, who blamed him for spoiling the team spirit by walking out of team meetings before the last two ODIs against the West Indies.

Afridi then announced his retirement in protest and lashed out at the board, resulting in the PCB initiating disciplinary action against him that included suspension of his central contract and revoking NOC issued to him to play in England.

Thereafter, Afridi went to the court to restrain the board from taking action against him.

But after the dispute generated political interference, the all-rounder finally withdrew his case and appeared before the disciplinary committee of the board, which fined him 4.5 million rupees for breaching the code of conduct, but also recommended the board to issue him the NOC to go and play for Hampshire in England.

Before leaving for England, Afridi said that his career was still not over and in due course of time he could make a comeback to the national team.

Speaking at length on the conflict, Butt said that as far as the PCB was concerned, Afridi was no longer a contracted player and “once the West Indies tour ended as per our policy he was no longer the captain“.

“Look as far as we are concerned he has retired from cricket although he didn’t inform us about his retirement decision as per the code of conduct. He is no more on our contract list so I find it surprising to hear him say he will make a comeback for Pakistan,” the former Test player said.

Butt also admitted there was great political interference during the conflict between Afridi and the Board.

“It was disappointing the issue was politicised. I point blank refused to everyone to pardon him. I told them I will not budge unless he (Afridi) follows the disciplinary process and I only met him when he agreed to appear before the disciplinary committee,” Butt said.

The PCB Chairman also said the Governor of Sindh had spoken to him for one hour on the issue and opposition leader Nawaz Sharif had also called him up.

“Governor told me to give NOC to Afridi. But I told him that I have committed to the new ICC code of conduct and Afridi has to appear before the disciplinary committee and he has to go through the code of conduct process.

“Nawaz Sharif also called me up and I told him this is not a political issue. I told him we (PCB) are not part of any politics, I think politicians get involved in cricket because it is a big thing in Pakistan and they get mileage,” he said.

Butt made it clear that he was disappointed with the way Afridi had behaved in the whole episode.

“I don’t want to go into details but let me tell you I had warned him and other players during New Zealand tour that I was not happy with their performances or body language. I remember during the ODI series, four or five young players came to me and told me about problems in the team,” he said.

Asked if the board had erred by not taking Afridi into confidence while deciding to remove him as captain after the West Indies tour, Butt said he didn’t think the board could have done things differently.

“It is a laid down policy that we appoint captain on a series to series basis and only Chairman has constitutional powers to appoint the captain.

“I think it was before the New Zealand tour he (Afridi) asked me why he was not being appointed captain on long term basis and I remember I told him that it was not our policy, and neither was I satisfied with his performance and there were not good reports from the manager. I told him there is no guarantee he can continue as captain,” said Butt.

The Chairman said that Afridi had let the board down by announcing his retirement from Test cricket after the first Test in Lords against Australia last year when he was made captain for all three formats of the game.

“We had told him we were comfortable with having one captain for all three formats. But he said make me captain. And then he just announced his retirement after Lord’s Test without speaking to me although I was there. In any other country he would never have played again as such things are not done anywhere else but we still gave him a chance.”

Butt said that, whether right or wrong, PCB had a laid down policy to announce the captain after every tour.

He said he had no doubt that some people had given wrong advice to Afridi in the recent dispute.

“I also want to make it clear there was no pressure on me to settle things with him. I am not one of those who take pressure,” he said.

Butt insisted that allegation that the PCB does not give respect to players, is not correct.

“Although he (Afridi) could approach me for anything but he never approached. Why would I want to change a successful captain,” said Butt.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.