Not many can claim to have played bowlers with such disdain as Azharuddin
As more than 50,000 fans crammed the Bombay Gymkhana ground on December 15, 1933, a cricketer of special talent made his mark in the first ever Test on Indian soil. On the third day of the match, Lala Amarnath, playing in his debut Test, crafted a sensational century. And a legend was born that day.
Many years later, Abbas Ali Baig (1959) and Hanumant Singh (1964) joined the league of Indian cricketers who scored a century on debut in Tests. And 20 years after Hanumant won the hearts of the public in Delhi, Mohammad Azharuddin created a symphony of a rare kind at the Eden Gardens in Calcutta.
Among those who watched Azharuddin's artistry at the crease was Sourav Ganguly, who, 12 years later, walked out to take guard at Lord's and scored a century on debut. His partner, Rahul Dravid, also making his debut, missed the three-figure mark by five runs. He opted to ‘walk' after being caught behind off a thin edge, but set a new benchmark for some exemplary conduct on the field. The Test set in motion two careers that took Indian cricket to great heights.
Glorious careers
Lala, Azhar, Ganguly and Dravid went on to lead India and carved glorious careers with their distinctive batting style.
If Baig and Hanumant failed to build on the great starts they had, the reasons were many. But most would agree that the two were a delight to watch. So was Vinoo Mankad, a legend in his own right. When Mankad made 14 and 63 at Lord's and took two for 107 on the 1946 tour, he had sealed his place in the team for some time to come. Returning to the same venue six years later, Mankad confirmed that he belonged to the highest league as he made the Test his own with a classy all-round performance (72 and 184 and five for 196).
There were batsmen who made half-centuries on debut against England — Sudhir Naik, Pranab Roy, Yadavendrasingh (Yuvraj of Patiala), C. Ramaswami, Dilawar Hussain, R.S. Modi, Amar Singh and C.D. Gopinath — but they did not quite capitalise on their bright beginning.
Modest debuts
There were some modest debuts by bowlers who later made a big contribution to Indian cricket. Mohammad Nissar took five on debut in 1932 and B.S. Chandrasekhar four. Nissar played five more Tests but Chandra ended up with 242 wickets from 58 Tests. The most notable was Anil Kumble, whose three for 105 at Old Trafford swelled to 619 wickets when he last bowled in a Test, against Australia in Delhi in 2008. The genial Kumble remains the greatest match-winning bowler India has ever seen.
Lala was known for unsettling the opposition with his innovative methods. He was unfazed by the opposition's reputation and always backed himself and his team.
Azharuddin did justice to his amazing potential. He lent strength to the middle-order and attracted a massive fan following with his entertaining batting style.
The ease with which he could whip the ball from off to leg was astounding. Not many can claim to have played the best of bowlers with such disdain and comfort.
On the eve of the Lord's Test in 1996, Ganguly spent a sleepless night. At the end of second day's play, he was unbeaten on 26. India lost Sachin Tendulkar, Azharuddin and Ajay Jadeja early on the third day, but Ganguly found in Dravid a splendid guide. Playing some magnificent strokes, Ganguly scored a century. The man who was called a “quota selection” had made a strong statement. Unsurprisingly, he grew into one of the finest batsmen and highly successful India captains.
Misses century
Dravid was prepared for his debut in 1996. His compact technique and determined approach meant agony for the English bowlers. The intensity was visible on his face as Dravid moved towards a century on debut at Lord's, but a faint nick off Chris Lewis ended his innings. It, however, propelled him towards greatness. Dravid (32 centuries; 153 matches) and Tendulkar (51 centuries; 177 matches) are the two members from that 1996 team still serving Indian cricket.
As India kicks off its Tests series against England at Lord's on July 21, it will depend on these two to retain its No. 1 position.
Keywords: Mohammad Azharuddin, Indian Test crickets





I am bit surprised that the name of GR Viswanath was not mentioned when talking about centuries on debut. Though it was in the second innings, it was a classic match saving effor against Australia at Kanpur in 1967. Also, he was the first debut centurion to break the long time hoodoo of Indian criket - debut centurions not scoring a century again in their career. In fact, Vishy was so famous for his wristy artistry that in some quarters Azhar was described as a taller version of Viswanath.
What we see now in terms of fitness and match preparedness, we saw Azhar doing it more than 2 decades ago.The diffrence being, we now have a complete backend support team with physios,fitness consultants, massaeurs etc., then Azhar did it on his own.
Azharuddin's off the legs half-shot makes the ball travel initially at a slow speed and after pitching it races to the boundary, a beauty to behold.Rolling of the wrists does the trick perhaps.Have n't come across any other batsman other than VVS Laxman execute this shot with panache.
Vijay writes well, but it is never just about the sporting performance and statistics. To club someone disgraced for match-fixing associations with the Pakistani underworld establishment such as Miandad, with some of the great 'characters' (literally) mentioned in his sentence is simply unpardonable. If this were only about cricket, with no mention of 'class' or 'exemplary conduct' (his words, not mine), then speaking of Azhar would warrant a mention of his fielding, perhaps, but nothing else. After the '70s, there was a period when no one in the Indian XI could be hailed for his work ethic while fielding. We may have never had Jonty Rhodeses on our playing eleven, but had had some great catchers, with good reflexes. Growing up wanting only to 'bat' kids never groomed themselves into overall players. Kapil probably was the first one after that lull whom we could call a genuine strike bowler. Azhar was a breath of fresh air on fielding, but killed the sport with other shady folk.
Please Email the Editor