Google asks US surveillance court to lift gag order

June 19, 2013 09:45 am | Updated November 16, 2021 08:40 pm IST - WASHINGTON

Google sharply challenged the federal government's gag order on its Internet surveillance programme, citing what it described as a First Amendment right to divulge how many requests it receives from the government for data about its customers in the name of national security.

Google sharply challenged the federal government's gag order on its Internet surveillance programme, citing what it described as a First Amendment right to divulge how many requests it receives from the government for data about its customers in the name of national security.

Google on Tuesday sharply challenged the U.S. government’s gag order on its Internet surveillance programme, citing what it described as a constitutional free speech right to divulge how many requests it receives from the government for data about its customers in the name of national security.

The move came in a legal motion filed in the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and is aimed at mending Google’s reputation after it was identified this month as one of nine U.S. Internet companies that gave the National Security Agency access to data on its customers.

Revelations about the programme, known as PRISM, by a former NSA contractor has opened a debate about the privacy of American’s communications.

The publication of such data requests by the government would answer questions about the number of Google users or accounts affected by U.S. intelligence activities. But it wouldn’t answer more critical questions on how much data is being disclosed, including whether information belonging to Americans has been swept up into investigations on a foreign targets.

“Google’s reputation and business has been harmed by the false or misleading reports in the media, and Google’s users are concerned by the allegations,” the company’s motion says. “Google must respond to such claims with more than generalities.”

Google has previously disclosed the number of data requests it receives from civilian law enforcement.

A company statement Tuesday said that “lumping national security requests together with criminal requests as some companies have been permitted to do would be a backward step for our users.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.