S & T » Technology

Updated: February 21, 2010 08:29 IST

Buzzing into the private space

Ajai Sreevatsan
Comment (1)   ·   print   ·   T  T  

If your life is abuzz with privacy worries right now, you are probably one of those who signed up for Google Buzz after its launch on February 9. Less than two weeks since its birth, Buzz has already seen what the collective ire of the online community looks like.

After a public apology from Buzz’s product manager Todd Jackson and promises of “major improvements,” the real issue at stake seems the nature and relevance of online privacy in an increasingly connected world.

On the day of the launch, Mr. Jackson wrote on the official Google blog that apart from following specific people whose posts one wants to see, Buzz “recommends posts from people you’re not directly following, often ones where your friends are having a lively conversation in the comments.”

Monetising user data

It went on to say that besides checking out buzz from people you’re following, the location-aware mobile version will allow you to see nearby buzz from the people around you.

That, in a way, explains Google’s approach to social networking. Aggregate data from various sites, initiate conversation around it and maximise the ability to monetise user data.

It also shows what can go wrong when you inject private contacts into a public stream.

Explaining the integration with Gmail inbox and pre-existing contacts, Google in an email response said: “Even people who want to keep their inbox focused on professional correspondence might discover that it is beneficial to share articles about what’s going on in their industry.”

But that doesn’t explain why publishing one’s frequent contact list on Gmail wasn’t ‘opt-in;’ or why Google Reader, Picasa and GChat posts must automatically become part of one’s Buzz stream for all the world to see.


Google quickly responded with modifications in all those areas. One can also delete Buzz using the tab in the ‘Settings’ page, which wasn’t available during launch. But it happened only after user outrage, only after the empire struck back.

Corporate take-over

Somewhere along the way, the online social movement has slowly turned into a corporate take-over, from Facebook’s Beacon to Google’s Buzz. From being virtual watering holes where people could meet up, social networking sites are increasingly moving towards monetizing means infringing on privacy — without consent.

There is a serious problem with any algorithm determining who my closest friends are using a frequently contacted list.

After all, it was the community that created @replies; it created the hash-tag interface; it sustains the amazing expanse of virtual identities, and only it can decide what the future will look like.

More In: Technology | Sci-Tech

Very true!
Buzz has taken a step on infringing the people's private space.
Not only this, it is a serious aspect where the already exiting users are being upset by the new monetising techniques of a website. I am myself a user of Buzz and quite unknowingly and unwittingly found out my public buzz to be having followers i never knew. The apology has said about serious improvements but the point still remains on what is the need of a new buzz when there are so many products already available from the Google bag. No doubt that the Google products are appreciated by one and all but that doesnt mean that we can let it dominate the entire virtual world we use.

from:  Mehwish Khan
Posted on: Feb 21, 2010 at 17:52 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor






Recent Article in Technology

“Spam sent over WhatsApp, Internet-based spam calls and spam messages — the current regulations do not cover it, and this is a major new front for unsolicited calls and messages,” Rajan Mathews, Director-General of the Cellular Operators Association of India, said.

India losing war on spam

WhatsApp and Internet-based spam on the rise: experts »