Human ancestors ‘smaller than rats’

June 06, 2013 02:14 pm | Updated 02:15 pm IST - Beijing

Early ancestors of human beings might be “miniscule monkeys” smaller than rats, an international study has said.

Studies of the world’s oldest known fossil primate skeleton, unearthed in central China’s Hubei Province in 2003, suggest that the early ancestors of humans might be very small creatures.

The nearly complete skeleton belongs to a new genus and species named Archicebus achilles, according to a paper co-written by Chinese, American and French scientists.

Scientists said the monkey lived 55 million years ago, during the early part of the Eocene epoch.

It is 7 million years older than the oldest primates known previously, including Darwinius from Messel in Germany and Notharctus from Wyoming in the United States.

The tiny primate had a body around 71 mm long and its weight was estimated between 20 and 30 grams.

Studies into its skeleton suggest that the creature was a frequent leaper favouring four-limbed grasp-leaping, and its small eyes and pointy teeth indicate it was an insect-hunter only by day.

Anatomy into its feet suggest the primate was adept at tree climbing and leaping.

Dr. Ni Xijun of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, who led the research team, said the primate was an early member of the tarsier family but one very close to anthropoids, which include monkeys, apes and humans.

“It lies close to the root of the primate phylogenetic tree, where the lineages of tarsiers and anthropoids have just begun to diverge, which explains why it bears traits of both tarsiers and anthropoids,” Dr. Ni told Chinese state-run Xinhua news agency.

Dr. Ni said the discovery of the new primate offered clues to the evolutionary roots of higher primates, or anthropoids, and illustrated the life of human’s farthest ancestors.

The fossil ‘Odd Hybrid’ was unearthed from an ancient lake-bed near the city of Jinzhou, near the course of the modern Yangtze River.

Scientists from the three countries spent ten years comparing more than 1,000 anatomical characters of 157 mammals to determine the fossil’s position in the primate family tree.

The primate lived during a period of global “greenhouse” conditions, when much of the world was shrouded in tropical rainforests, scientists said.

The study was published in the latest edition of the journal Nature .

Christopher Beard, palaeontologist at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh and co-author of the article, described the new species as differing radically from any other primate known to science.

“It looks like an odd hybrid with the feet of a small monkey, the arms, legs and teeth of a very primitive primate,” Beard said, adding that unlike others in the tarsier family distinguished by their enormous eyes, the primate had surprisingly small eyes.“Most living or fossil tarsiers have big eyes as they are nocturnal creatures relying mainly on vision when foraging,” said Dr. Beard.

The small eyes of the new primate suggest it preyed in the day like an anthropoid, Dr. Ni said.

“There is a saying that anthropoids have walked from darkness to light, but our study suggests the earliest primates were never night owls,” Dr. Ni said.

The fossil takes its name from the Greek arche, meaning beginning or first, and the Latin cebus, meaning long-tailed monkey.

The species name achilles derived from the mythological Greek warrior Achilles, highlighting the creature’s unusual heels.

“Its feet were very long, even longer than its lower legs. But it had short and wide heels, which is one defining character of anthropoids,” Dr. Ni wrote in the article.

“It can grasp the branch using its feet when performing a jump, so its hands were freed for performing other motions, like seizing a bug,” Dr. Ni said, adding that this might have laid the biological basis for evolution of higher primates toward walking upright.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.