Today's Paper Archive Classifieds Subscriptions RSS Feeds Site Map ePaper Mobile Apps Social
SEARCH

S & T » Science

Updated: September 9, 2012 04:05 IST

Evolution “prevails” in South Korea

R. Prasad
Share  ·   Comment (1)   ·   print   ·  
A July 2011 research paper in Nature revealed that archaeopteryx is no longer a primitive bird. The panel constituted by South Korea to oversee the textbook revision, however, felt that this does not
undermine the theory of evolution. Photo: Special Arrangement
A July 2011 research paper in Nature revealed that archaeopteryx is no longer a primitive bird. The panel constituted by South Korea to oversee the textbook revision, however, felt that this does not undermine the theory of evolution. Photo: Special Arrangement

Starting 2013, science textbooks in South Korea will continue to carry information on archaeopteryx, once considered the primitive bird fossil, and other examples of evolution, reports Nature. The major victory for science comes nearly four months after the South Korean government issued a petition to the publishers to revise high school textbooks by excluding examples of the evolution of archaeopteryx and horse.

If the sustained campaign led by the Society for Textbook Revise (STR) to remove “errors” and provide “correct” information to students convinced the government to issue the petition in May, the September 5 decision comes following an expert panel’s recommendation.

The STR members believe in creationism and wanted the textbooks purged of other “flawed” examples of evolution including that of human beings.

Nature played a vital role in first publishing the South Korean government’s May 2012 decision worldwide. Leading newspapers across the world, including The Hindu, reported the retrograde decision. The furore created by scientists from South Korea and many other countries forced the government to revisit its decision and set up the 11-member panel to oversee the textbook revision. It included five experts on evolution and fossils.

The panel favoured inclusion of archaeopteryx to explain evolution. This despite the fact that a July 2011 research paper in Nature revealed that it was no longer a primitive bird.

The panel favoured the inclusion of archaeopteryx as “the scientific debate about whether [it] gave rise to all birds or is just one example of a feathered dinosaur does not undermine the theory of evolution itself.” The panel also found the explanation on the evolution of horse “too simplistic” and hence wanted it either “revised or replaced” with another example.

More In: Science | Sci-Tech

Science is ever growing. Today's finding of a scientific fact on sound
scientific research data/finding may be modified or disproved by a new
fact tomorrow based on a new finding/data. Hence Science is also known
as "self rectifying fact". Any social activism or over reach by any
individual or group to decry any of the existing scientific fact should
have been addressed with caution at the first instant by the South
Korean Govt.

from:  Prof. N. Gunachandran
Posted on: Sep 9, 2012 at 10:14 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in Science

UNTAINTED: No adverse health effects have been established as being caused by mobile phone use, the WHO states. Photo: C. Ratheesh Kumar

An unscientific report on ‘mitigating’ EM radiation effects

The document hardly has any scientific basis, uses scary language and is riddled with questionable claims »