Iceberg-glacier collision could trigger climatic changes

February 27, 2010 12:51 am | Updated 10:36 am IST - SYDNEY

This combo shows two satellite images released on February 26, 2010 from the Australian Antarctic Division of the Mertz Glacier Tongue (L), a 160-kilometer spit of floating ice protruding into the Southern Ocean from East Antarctica on January 7, 2010 (top image) and then on February 20, 2010 (bottom) after the Mertz Glacier Tonue broke off when it was dislodged by another, older iceberg, known as B9B (iceberg at R), which split off in 1987. Photo: AFP

This combo shows two satellite images released on February 26, 2010 from the Australian Antarctic Division of the Mertz Glacier Tongue (L), a 160-kilometer spit of floating ice protruding into the Southern Ocean from East Antarctica on January 7, 2010 (top image) and then on February 20, 2010 (bottom) after the Mertz Glacier Tonue broke off when it was dislodged by another, older iceberg, known as B9B (iceberg at R), which split off in 1987. Photo: AFP

An iceberg about the size of Luxembourg, which struck a glacier off Antarctica dislodging another massive block of ice, could lower oxygen levels in the world’s oceans, Australian and French scientists said on Friday.

The two icebergs are now drifting together about 100 to 150 km off Antarctica, following the collision on February 12 or 13, said Australian Antarctic Division glaciologist Neal Young.

“It gave it a pretty big nudge,” Mr. Young said of the 97- km-long iceberg that collided with the giant floating Mertz Glacier and shaved off a new iceberg. “They are now floating right next to each other.”

The new iceberg is 78 km long and about 39 km wide and holds roughly the equivalent of a fifth of the world’s annual total water usage, Mr. Young said.

Experts are concerned about the effect of the massive displacement of ice on the ice-free water next to the glacier, which is important for ocean currents.

This area of water had been kept clear because of the glacier, said Steve Rintoul, a leading climate expert. With part of the glacier gone, the area could fill with sea ice and disrupt the ability for the dense and cold water to sink.

This sinking water is what spills into ocean basins and feeds the global ocean currents with oxygen.

As there are only a few areas in the world where this occurs, a slowing of the process would mean less oxygen into the deep currents that feed the oceans.

“There may be regions of the world’s oceans that lose oxygen, and then of course most of the life there will die,” said Mario Hoppema, a German-based chemical oceanographer.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.