The U.S. Food and Drug Administration made history this week as it gave its first ever nod for an anti-HIV drug, Truvada, to pharmaceutical firm Gilead Sciences. Yet the move was greeted with scepticism in some quarters, particularly from AIDS Healthcare Foundation, the U.S.’ largest HIV/AIDS non-profit medical provider, which described the FDA decision as “reckless.”
Truvada is known chemically as a fixed-dose, daily intake combination of emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Since 2004 it has been marketed as a treatment for those already infected with HIV. However beginning in 2010, clinical studies demonstrated that the drug could prevent people from contracting the infection in the first place.
According to some public health advocates these studies show that Truvada could be a preventive measure for high-risk individuals such as those with HIV-positive partners — only when combined with sexual health counselling and the use of condoms.
In particular reports cited a three-year study showing that a daily intake of Truvada reduced the “risk of infection in healthy gay and bisexual men by 42 per cent when accompanied by condoms and counselling.”
In 2011 another study found that Truvada reduced infection by 75 per cent in heterosexual couples in which one partner was infected, according to reports.
However Michael Weinstein, co-founder and president of AHF, argued that healthy individuals should be required to show proof of a negative HIV test before getting Truvada as a prevention medicine. “If it’s that important, why isn’t it a requirement?’’ he was quoted as saying.
One of Mr. Weinstein’s biggest concerns is that close to 21 per cent of HIV-positive individuals in the U.S. were said to be unaware of their infection. If they did not get tested before taking Truvada as prevention, “there is a possibility that the HIV strains they have could become resistant to treatment — and that they might spread these strains unknowingly to their partners.”
Also the requirement that it be taken daily may be too onerous and skipped dosages could thus lead to further risk that drug-resistant HIV strains may emerge, the AHF has noted.
Yet announcing the FDA’s approval the agency’s Commissioner Margaret Hamburg said, “Today’s approval marks an important milestone in our fight against HIV... every year, about 50,000 U.S. adults and adolescents are diagnosed with HIV infection, despite the availability of prevention methods and strategies to educate, test, and care for people living with the disease. New treatments as well as prevention methods are needed to fight the HIV epidemic in this country.”
Keywords: Food and Drug Administration, anti-HIV drug approval, Truvada, Gilead Sciences, AIDS Healthcare Foundation



Good arguments by Mr. Weinstein. What does AHF stands for?
While feeling happy regarding the development it is imperative to
address the valid concerns of Mr.Weinberg. The daily dose regimen is
too cumbersome to follow and the drug intake may infuse a false
reassurance and subsequent carelessness in following other more
impotant and effective preventive measures like condoms, universal
precautions, and avoidance of needle sharing. Furthermore AIDS is not
a disease where just a 40% reduction in transmission will bring smiles
in the high risk group. The real pre exposure prophylaxis will be
provided by biotechnological and immunological research and not by a
chemotherapeutic agent.
Yuvraj..... a caveat. This drug from Gilead, which is a combination, had been previously approved for HIV+ individuals here in the US and elsewhere. The newer indication for Truvada (approved previously and need to be prescribed by a doctor)is for prophylactic (meaning preventive) purposes. This could be useful for those people (say nurses, doctors) who treat AIDS victim. Previously for many blood borne diseases vaccine held the promise for care givers but vaccine for AIDS virus is still some years away. I believe that while the news is good it can also be abused. My worry is people working in sex industries will misuse and more so in place like India (loosely regulated regulated markets)emboldened by the fact that this drug works in a preventive manner. As goes with any drugs misuse always results in resistant strains of virus or bacteria and that is a big concern.
great news for the patient their what would be for India...
watch the conditon of India At realsneak.com
Atlast a great success and it comes to an end by finding a new potential anti-HIV candidate. hats off to the scientists on behalf of all biotechnologists.....
Please Email the Editor