T. rex was indeed a predator

July 18, 2013 02:53 am | Updated November 16, 2021 08:56 pm IST

File photo: A Tyrannosaurus rex dinosaur replica at the Woodland Park Zoo in Seattle.

File photo: A Tyrannosaurus rex dinosaur replica at the Woodland Park Zoo in Seattle.

Scientists have discovered a fossilised tooth belonging to the vicious Tyrannosaurus rex dinosaur, which they claim provides solid evidence that the creature was indeed a predator, hunter and killer, and not a scavenger as some palaeontologists have suggested.

T. rex has long been popular as the most notorious, vicious killing creature to roam the planet during the age of the dinosaurs. However, for more than a century some palaeontologists have argued that T. rex was a scavenger, not a true predator — more like a vulture than a lion.

T. rex is the monster of our dreams,” said David Burnham, preparator of vertebrate palaeontology at the Biodiversity Institute at the University of Kansas.

“But ever since it was discovered in Montana and named in the early 1900s, there’s been a debate about whether these large carnivores were scavengers or predators.

“Most people assume they were predators, but the scientific evidence for predation has been really elusive.

Yes, we’ve found lots of dinosaur skeletons with tooth marks that had been chewed up by something.

“But what did that really prove? Yes, these large carnivores fed on other dinosaurs — but did they eat them while they were alive or dead? That’s where the debate came in. Where was the evidence for hunt and kill?” Burnham said.

Now, Burnham and his team have unearthed physical proof that T. rex was indeed a predator, hunter and killer. In the Hell Creek Formation of South Dakota, Burnham and colleagues discovered the crown of a T. rex tooth lodged in the fossilised spine of a plant-eating hadrosaur that seems to have survived the attack.

Previous evidence for predation included T. rex fossil discoveries with preserved stomach contents that included the bones of a young ceratopsian (eg, Triceratops or one of its kin).

However, there was no evidence to conclude whether the ceratopsian was alive or dead when the T. rex made a snack of it.

By contrast, Burnham said the tooth was definitive evidence of hunting, after carefully measuring its length and the size of its serrations to ensure that it came from the mouth of a T. rex.

“Lo and behold, the tooth plotted out just exactly with T. rex — the only known large theropod from the Hell Creek formation,” Burnham said.

“We knew we had a T. rex tooth in the tail of a hadrosaur. We knew the hadrosaur got away because the bone had begun to heal.

“Quite possibly it was being pursued by the T. rex when it was bitten. It was going in the right direction — away. The hadrosaur escaped by some stroke of luck,” he said.

The team describes the find in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences .

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.