The funds would strengthen institutional mechanism for biodiversity conservation in India
In a bid to kick-start the stalled process of raising global funds for biodiversity conservation, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh committed $50 million (over Rs. 264 crore) for what he called the ‘Hyderabad Pledge’ as India takes over the two-year presidency of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
This sum would “strengthen the institutional mechanism for biodiversity conservation in India. We will use these funds to enhance the technical and human capabilities of our national and State mechanisms to attain CBD objectives,” Dr. Singh told delegates at the inauguration of the high-level segment of the U.N. summit on Tuesday. “We have also earmarked funds to promote similar capacity building in developing countries.”
Senior Environment Ministry officials said the funding for other countries would be to the tune of Rs. 50 crore.
“We will put the Hyderabad Pledge on the website, and invite other nations to add their contributions,” said Special Secretary M.F. Farooqui. “It was worked out with the CBD secretariat in the hope that we can use it as leverage for more global funding.”
“One of the most difficult tasks facing this conference is agreement on how to ensure the mobilisation of adequate investment for biodiversity,” said CBD executive secretary Braulio Ferreira de Souza Dias. “The launch of the Hyderabad Pledge...sets a strong example.”
Negotiations on funding targets collapsed on Monday night and are set to resume on Wednesday. Developed countries wanted to start with discussions on need assessment and accountability through a reporting framework. Frustrated developing countries, who feel that this is mere stalling, stressed the need to set interim targets, at least.
As the negotiations enter the final stretch, Environment Minister Jayanthi Natarajan urged delegates to reach an agreement on interim investment commitments in order to “infuse confidence” and “generate momentum” for the implementation of the 2020 Aichi Targets on conservation.
Unless a decision is reached on funding, there will be no major success story for India to announce from Hyderabad, and the global community would have lost two more years in the drive for the 2020 targets. “This would be our collective failure,” said Ms. Natarajan.
Later in the evening, she released an expert panel’s report, which estimated that an annual investment of somewhere between $150 billion and $ 440 billion would be needed to meet the Aichi targets.
At the inaugural, the Prime Minister also acknowledged need for a “happy compromise that will secure a future that provides ecological and economic space for each one of us,” a potentially significant statement at a time when environmental concerns are seen as hurdles to economic growth by a vocal industry lobby.
He emphasised need for “inclusive conservation” policies that would take into account the “GDP of the poor.” He highlighted the Forest Rights Act, which gives legal sanctity to the rights of forest dwellers — “often the best friends of the biodiversity in the forests” — and said a similar approach would be adopted to protect the livelihoods of fishermen and marine biodiversity.






The announcement is more farcical and face-saving gimmick of policy-
makers. The over-riding concerns should be much larger issues of
involving the process of changing the present level of economic models
and shift in assumptions of market economy.
So long as the imperative steps needed for restraining the population
growth remain elusive, the deployment of resources for meeting the
burgeoning demand on natural resources will continue. Concurrently
steps would needed to initiate paradigm shift in economic models
based on wrong assumption of infinite resources. The point is how to
do this without affecting the livelihoods of majority of people. This
is the tight rope walk no politician on planet Earth dare undertake.
The long term advantages of conserving resources and greater
biodiversity are put on sacrificial altar in favour of short term
gains of current economic situations like GDP rate, FDI, development
of nuclear energy
It is a pity that our (all the politicians) treat biodiversity as a
luxury and a realm of academics. THey neither understand nor try to
understand the short and long term implications on the society and
humanity in general. As a student of remote sensing, I could argue
that the amount that Dr. Singh has pledged is totally insufficient to
even monitor a region then where is developing biodiversity. In
addition to this is the red tape. It is really unfortunate, that while
our politicians understand money they hardly even comprehend that to
continue making money (by honest or dishonest means) biodiversity is a
necessity and not luxury...
(50 millions for biodiversity and NIB to fast track investments
overriding Environmental concerns - I believe this is contradictory!)
Please Email the Editor