Destroying nature will ruin economies, cultures

UN biodiversity chief to push for more ambitious targets. Damage to natural world ‘reaching tipping point’.

August 17, 2010 05:07 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 09:00 pm IST - London

The frozen remains of two Woolly Mammoths, long extinct elephants in the Ice Age uncovered from the Siberian permafrost at the Taiwan National Democracy Memorial Hall, in Taipei, Taiwan. Scientists estimate that 150-200 species of plant, insect, bird and mammal become extinct every 24 hours.

The frozen remains of two Woolly Mammoths, long extinct elephants in the Ice Age uncovered from the Siberian permafrost at the Taiwan National Democracy Memorial Hall, in Taipei, Taiwan. Scientists estimate that 150-200 species of plant, insect, bird and mammal become extinct every 24 hours.

Countries face a collapse of their economies and loss of culture if they do not protect the environment better, the world’s leading champion of nature has warned.

“What we are seeing today is a total disaster,” said Ahmed Djoghlaf, the secretary-general of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity. “No country has met its targets to protect nature. We are losing biodiversity at an unprecedented rate. If current levels [of destruction] go on we will reach a tipping point very soon. The future of the planet now depends on governments taking action in the next few years.” Industrialisation, population growth, the spread of cities and farms, and climate change are all now threatening the fundamentals of life itself, said Djoghlaf, in London before a UN meeting in which governments are expected to sign up to a more ambitious deal to protect nature.

“Many plans were developed in the 1990s to protect biodiversity but they are still sitting on the shelves of ministries. Countries were legally obliged to act, but only 140 have even submitted plans and only 16 have revised their plans since 1993. Governments must now put their houses in order,” he said.

According to the UN Environment Programme, the Earth is in the middle of a mass extinction of life. Scientists estimate that 150-200 species of plant, insect, bird and mammal become extinct every 24 hours. This is nearly 1,000 times the “natural” or “background” rate and, claim many biologists, is greater than anything the world has experienced since the dinosaurs vanished nearly 65m years ago. Around 15% of mammal species and 11 per cent of bird species are classified as threatened with extinction.

Djoghlaf warned Britain and other countries not to cut nature protection amid the recession. In a reference to expected 40 per cent cuts in Britain’s Department of the Environment spending, he said, “You may well save a few pounds now but you will lose billions later. Biodiversity is your natural asset. The more you lose it, the more you lose your cultural assets too.” Djoghlaf said, 300 million people who depended on forests and the more than 1 billion who lived off sea fishing were in immediate danger. “Cut your forests down, or over-fish, and these people will not survive. Destroying biodiversity only increases economic insecurity. The more you lose it, the more you lose the chance to grow.” He added, “The loss of biodiversity compounds poverty. Biodiversity is fundamental to social life, education and aesthetics. It’s a human right to live in a healthy environment.” Djoghlaf criticised countries for separating action on climate change from protecting biodiversity. “The loss of biodiversity exacerbates climate change. But it is handled by the poorest ministries in government, it has not been mainstreamed or prioritised by governments. Climate change cannot be solved without action on biodiversity, and vice versa.” The UN chief said that children were losing contact with nature. “In Algeria, children are growing up who have never seen olive trees. How can you protect nature if you do not know it?” A UN report on the impact of biodiversity loss, out in October, is expected to say that the economic case for global action to stop species destruction is even more powerful than the argument for tackling climate change. It will say that saving biodiversity is cost-effective and the benefits from saving “natural goods and services”, such as pollination, medicines, fertile soils, clean air and water, are between 10 and 100 times the cost of saving the habitats and species that provide them.

Copyright: Guardian News & Media 2010

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.