About 35 per cent of external input cost seems to have been reduced
The main objective of technology-based agriculture must be to reduce input cost while increasing the yield, particularly for small and marginal farmers.
Agriculture scientists would like farmers to realise that reduction of chemical-based fertilizers and pesticides can benefit both man and earth over the long run. Farmers in particular would stand to gain as a major portion of their money is spent on buying these chemicals.
The focus, they believe, must shift to educating farmers on the value of waste matter being generated in both their fields and homes, and availability of technologies to convert waste into wealth. Their farm economics will definitely improve if they realise and adopt this.
It is precisely on these lines that scientists at the Myrada Krishi Vigyan Kendra at Gobichettipalayam, in Erode, Tamil Nadu have beenworking for the past several years in implementing a project called IFD (Integrated farm development model). Also called as LESA (LowExternal Input Sustainable Agriculture), the project is at present operational in about 32 villages in Erode district.
Designed well
According to P. Alagesan, Programme Coordinator, IFD is an innovative model especially designed for small-scale farmers for improving farm productivity in a sustainable manner by recycling farm and home wastes.
“The main concept of IFD is to integrate the animal and human wastes into useful and productive components for the manufacture of vermicompost, pest repellents and biogas, thereby reducing input cost for farmers,” he says.
For example, in villages, the urine and dung from cattle are usually washed into a drain or the dung is collected, dried and used as cooking fuel.
“But our IFD farmers collect the urine and dung in a collection tank and use it for generating biogas and manufacturing bio growth promoters such as Panchagavya and Amirtha karaisal, and to make bio pest-repellants,” explains Mr. Alagesan.
Breeding earthworms
The spent slurry from the biogas plant is used for making high quality manure by adding other farm wastes to it, and can also be used for breeding earthworms.
“To ensure food and fodder security, our research team has been conducting several programmes to emphasise the importance of kitchengardens.
The size of the kitchen garden depends on the family size and income (usually 2-5 cents). A limited supply of water channelled through a low cost micro-irrigation system ensures a good harvest,” he elaborates. High yielding green fodder varieties are also grown in these gardens to provide fodder for animals. By growing these fodder varieties,the cost of buying feed has come down by nearly 12 per cent, according to Mr. Alagesan.
Technology must be farmer friendly, and IFD farmers have been trained in scientific storage of harvested produce. The farmers store theirharvested grains in special grain structures called ‘pucca koti' (in Hindi) and metal bins.
These storage structures have been able to minimise grain loss by nearly 20 per cent, and also protect the harvested produce from pestand pathogenic infestations.
Finally, the waste generated from the farmer's family is also not wasted. An eco-san toilet has been designedto collect the faeces and urine separately.
The faeces is covered with wood ash after collection and it falls into a soil pit and decomposes into a rich nutrient which can be safelyused as manure.
The urine is separately channelled to the kitchen garden where it seeps into the earth to nourish the plants.Studies conducted in these villages have shown that about 35 per cent of external input cost has been reduced by effective utilisation offarm and home wastes.
Forest regeneration
Use of biogas (2 cubic metre capacity has the potential to save about 210 kg of fuel wood per month) has also brought down firewood consumption. In a village called M.P. Doddi, about nine tonnes of fuel wood in a month has been saved, having a direct impact on regeneration of forest area around the region.
Respiratory problems commonly encountered by the rural women in smoky kitchens have largely been minimised.UNICEF has identified this as an innovative model and has planned to replicate it in other parts of the country.
For more information readers can contact: Mr. P.Alagesan, Programme Coordinator, Myrada Krishi Vigyan Kendra, No: 57 - Bharathi Street,Gobichettipalayam - 638 452, Erode District, Tamil Nadu, e-mail: myradakvk@dataone.in, website: www.myradakvk.org, mobile: 09443897654, Phone : 04285 226694 and 226695.
Keywords: Myrada Krishi Vigyan Kendra
great job
Technology transfer to rural areas and agriculture sector is negligible. Govt is interested in
distributing free money to rural labour under various schemes named after Gandhi family.
There is no effort on the part of Govt to popularise Bio Gas etc.
I have visited these villages and can vouch for the transformational experience that is now attracting many visitors, not only farmers from other areas but also development workers, scientists, government agencies, journalists and others. Harsha Satya is charitable when s/he says farmers are labelled as 'backward, superstitious'; in fact, agricultural universities still teach students to label farmers with adjectives ranging from progressive to laggards! The twist of irony is that earlier it was the 'chemical' farmer who was progressive and today it is the 'organic' farmer!
Prabhakaran makes a good point that city dwellers can also try to adopt conservation oriented technologies. I myself use a solar cooker in the summer months which considerably extends the time to exhaust the LPG cylider.
@Harsha, Valid point ! High Yielding seeds and consistent irrigation are definite plus from our Green Revolution. However, it is not so when it comes to chemical fertlizers or pesticides.
This is really good article. Those fortunate city dwellers, who has space can also adopt this and contribute towards saving fuel. Thanks to The Hindu for bringing out this information.
Innovation at grass root level will help us gain maximum from rural
India. It is definitely heartening to see such efforts and, above all,
its promotion. Except of some typos, article is very comprehensive and
educative.
The second and third paragraphs are very interesting and worth making a note. It seems it is the scientists who are educating the farmers on why not to use chemical fertilizers and pesticides. And how waste can be turned into wealth in the field. It were these scientists who while promoting energy intensive farming in 70s and 80s said the exact opposites, and called farmers by names (backward, superstitious etc) as they followed traditional low input farming. The farmers have always had the wisdom and knowledge to convert waste into fuel. When will the agricultural scientists in India be humble enough to realize the gravity of the mistake committed during green revolution. when will they acknowledge that the farmers have always known better when it comes to agriculture.
Recycling organic waste in homesteads as manure and water is a desirable step to reduce
cost on inputs especially fertizers.Vermicompost is an organic solid manure and vermiwash,
a mutritious and growth promoting substance.Caution is required in the use of human
faecal matter and urine for agriculture purpose and more so from patients suffering from
diarrhea,pneumonia,digestive disorders etc.Direct use is prohibited and they need to be
sanitized and made free from pathogenic bacteria,fungi,irises etc.In China human fecal
matter including urea are converted and certified free from heavy metals too.
Great job, This is where and then at least, ministers and higher
officials needs to concentrate on, rather playing politics.
Please Email the Editor