While some politicians may certainly be black sheep, it is erroneous to portray the entire system as faulty. To take a cricketing analogy, when a few players are found guilty of match fixing, do we ban the sport altogether?
Last August, while we were filling nursery admission application forms for our daughter, most friends advised me not to mention “politics” as my profession, as it could impact her chances of admission. After all, the Anna movement was at its peak and the reputation of politicians at an all-time low. I, however, decided to remain firm in my conviction, only to get a bitter taste of how politicians were regarded during the parental interaction at one of the premier schools. Around the same time, my niece, studying in Class VI, commented that since I was a politician, I must be corrupt.
The recent cartoon controversy can also be seen in this context, and maybe as a reaction of the political class against the constant attacks on it. Politicians across the spectrum rose in unison to speak against the use of cartoons in textbooks, arguing that it would create a negative impression in the minds of teenagers who would see all politicians in a poor light, much like my niece. The lone voice of dissent, suggesting that politicians themselves were perhaps also responsible for their portrayal in cartoons, was drowned out in the chorus.
Negative perception
It is indeed sad that today people have developed a negative perception of politics and politicians, however justified. Recent times have seen a number of examples where the conduct of our politicians is much below what we desire/expect of them. Scams, corruption cases, unethical personal conduct, and blatant use of money and muscle power — the examples are many.
Rather than just criticise, Parliament should have used this situation and the occasion of 60th year of Indian parliamentary democracy to reflect and introspect on, debate and address this growing discontent among the people and take concrete steps, by creating a road map, to further strengthen our democratic structures. This would have shown the way forward for the other pillars of our system. What could have been a perfect opportunity, however, was sadly lost in the cacophony of outrage.
Parliamentarians, while debating the cartoons controversy, were articulating their general concern at a growing trend in which politics and politician bashing has become fashionable among the media, civil society and other social groups. The media play an important role in formulating public opinion, especially in this age of 24-hour television. In the aftermath of the Mumbai terror attacks, the media focussed attention on fuelling public anger against politicians, instead of dwelling more on the root cause of terror and its solutions. Irrationality became the order of the day on primetime television.
A similar story played out last year during the Anna Hazare movement on the Lokpal Bill, when all politicians were painted as thieves and dacoits and the entire system was attacked! All forms of mass media — newspapers, television channels, films and social networks — united in painting an erroneous picture of the politician as the villain in the democratic system, some even going so far as to advocate autocracy and totalitarianism! While some politicians may certainly be the black sheep, it is erroneous to portray the entire system as faulty. To take a cricketing analogy, when a few players are found guilty of match fixing, do we ban the sport altogether? Do we stop idolising Tendulkar, Dravid, Dhoni or Ganguly as individuals even when the team does badly?
Unlike other professions, politicians have to face their ‘clients’, the citizens of the country for a referendum every five years. In a democratic system, the onus therefore lies with us, the general public, to either elect leaders of our choice or, better still, become a part of the system ourselves and change it for the better. And we should not need an Aamir Khan goading us to do so before we finally wake up.
Amid the prevalent negativity, I today remain even more convinced that parliamentary democracy remains the best form of governance in India, in spite of all its complications and scope for further improvements. Attacks on its very foundation, of the kind seen in recent times will only serve to increase the levels of cynicism and despair among people. The situation that has developed in the country in the last few years is extremely traumatic for someone like me — educated, from a middle class family, without any political inheritance or godfather — yet someone who chose politics as a means to serve the nation despite other career options.
However, as has been clearly pointed out to me during my daughter’s admission process, I cannot call myself a politician, simply because I am not yet an MP or MLA! And of course there is no guarantee that I may become one! For me, politics is also about participative democracy and making a positive impact on society.
Let me cite a recent example from my village. There was a long-standing property dispute between two families, who were neighbours. It even led to physical violence and court cases. Finally, knowing that I was a politician, they asked me to mediate, and I was able to facilitate an amicable solution to the issue and also bring about reconciliation between the parties.
Although a small incident, this case gave me tremendous satisfaction as I was able to make a positive impact. However, persistent negativity about politicians and the political system could become a de-motivating factor for many others, who are young, enlightened, honest and committed and who aspire, in their own little ways, to create an impact on the democratic system and contribute to nation-building.
The need of the hour is to take steps to further strengthen our democratic foundations. Our politicians need to take a leading role in combating the continued negative portrayal, by reasserting their roles and responsibilities in the democratic fabric of the country, both within and outside Parliament. Like our forefathers, today’s leaders need to set examples and be figures of inspiration for the younger generation. This will ultimately see Indian democracy emerging stronger in the days ahead. And as for my daughter, she secured admission to another premier institute, where even as a politician, I was well received.
(The writer has a PhD from Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, and is a former National General Secretary, Indian Youth Congress. His email is chandanjnu@gmail.com)
Keywords: Indian politics

Dr Yadav's column is wanting in substance & connect with the ground reality. Politics is not a bad word - rather, it is a neccesary engine that can make or break a nation. In fact, anyone who has a view on policy making & execution (including me who is expressing this view) is a politician - as politician need to have party affiliation. BUT, we need to admit that politicians of the last few decades have spared no effort in embedding 'politician'as the dirtiest profession in our minds.
This has been embedded so strongly, thanks to their BLATANT use of UNFAIR means to grab power, CRUEL tactics to hold power, sophesticated techniques to siphon money and audacity to IGNORE genunie concerns/problems of people who they claim to represent. Dr Yadav's comment "politicians have to face their ‘clients’, the citizens of the country for a referendum every five years" comes across as a poor thought. 5 years of power is enough to amass huge wealth so as not to seek mandate from 'clients' again !
The ills of corruption,nepotism and abuse of power are not any new phenomenon unknown and these are there in the country's politics all along.What has made people to frustratingly dilate on the cancerous development is the frequency of newer cases coming up in steady flow and the monstrous dimensions of corruption involving crores of people's money.The sheer size of corruption makes the exasperated people to tar the whole system itself though the fact is that there is vast majority of honest people holding public office sustaining the system.
Being a political activist I can very well understand the angle that
Dr.Yadav explores while writing his heart out. To add my point to his
points I would like to say that Politics is not a profession which can
easily be professed. Every year thousands of young people join the
political process and aspire to become politicians. They are not all
corrupts. We also have to understand why arent these non-corrupt
individuals at the helm of affairs (except for a few)? The reason is
we the society have been prejudiced towards them. If they are honest
we say "he/she is in wrong profession! It is because of such apathy
that the political system has the highest no of drop-outs!
Only if we could come up with social mechanisms to promote the Dynamic
and Honest people and stop the prjudice against this domain, we will
see better politicians.
I agree with the words of Dr.Yadav though I also feel that politicians
have to feel the burns of any National Outrage.
I am a retired person living in my native village; I also wanted to
bring good governance and participated in the panchayat elections for
the village president. I spent Rs.4000 only and lost the elections.
One contestant spent nearly 12 lakhs and lost too; the winner spent
around ten lakhs. The voters got cash, illicit liquor, and also other
free items. Names like Mahatma Gandhi, Nehru, Kamaraj and others do
not cut ice with the present generation. We do not need politicians to
think about the problems of the common people and find ways to
alleviate the same. Any honest and sincere person (without corruption)
is okay as a councilor in a panchayat to the PM level; after all there
is a big battalion of IAS officials who are specially trained to do
the governance. This person indicates about a problem and the IAS
officials find the solution for the same, but most unfortunately the
IAS officials hint the various ways to make money to the politicians
hence the sorry state of affairs.
Dr. Yadav seems to have got the most important aspects all wrong:
1. Do you really believe that the problem of corruption is a small one
and is limited to 'a few black sheep'? Trust me, even the most naive
will not believe that the problem of corruption is small and limited.
There might be only a few exceptional 'white sheep'. It is agreed that
not ALL politicians are corrupt -- may be 1 or 2% are clean, but so
what?
2. No one is saying that Parliamentary democracy needs to be changed.
You are only deflecting attention by needlessly defending
parliamentary democracy. The popular mood is not about doing away the
democracy, but people want strong provisions for tough punishment for
the corrupt. And the way you neta log killed the Lokpal, has only (justifiably) reinforced the image that most politicians are corrupt.
PS: Most would think that the second institution got scared of you, wanted to be in your good books, or it was run by another politician.
Dr.Yadav,
Your trauma, as a honest person, at the current perception of your
career choice is understandable, but please consider the trauma that
the ordinary citizen has been going through in the last 60 years that
has led to this 'perception'. You have managed to cite *one* example
to bolster the case for respect for politics. Even that example is
about a warring family 'recognizing' the need for political
interference - a recognition that ironically (given the main thrust of
your article) might be because of another widespread perception - that
anyone 'in politics', whether a party member or an MLA/MP/Minister,
is a 'connected' and powerful person.
Respect is earned, not given or taken or negotiated. If politics is to
regain its respect in the eyes of our people, the requirement is
simple - the many that you yourself admit - "Scams, corruption cases,
unethical personal conduct, and blatant use of money and muscle power
— the examples are many" should become zero.
Please Email the Editor