Why due process matters

#MeToo without due process could subvert the goals and values of the rule of law, including equality and transformative justice

May 24, 2018 12:15 am | Updated October 13, 2018 04:03 pm IST

Justice flat icon isolated on white background. vector illustration icon

Justice flat icon isolated on white background. vector illustration icon

The legal system has failed women in India. In two recent cases, we saw even lawmakers and enforcers becoming perpetrators of sexual violence or defending the accused. The chilling details of the Kathua and Unnao cases are telling but perhaps only the tip of the iceberg.

It is in this context that those who support anonymous lists such as the list of “sexual harassers in academia” have debunked the call for “due process”. They argue that due process has done too little for women who have chosen to complain against sexual harassment. There is little hope from mechanisms such as the Internal Complaints Committee established under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act of 2013, which, in effect, rely on due process principles like the presumption of innocence and a standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt. The critique of due process is a sign of frustration with and disruption of the status quo. Yet, if the critique debunks due process normatively, as part of our conception of the Rule of Law, substantive equality and transformative justice, we need to reconsider the critique.

Due process, as part of the ideal of Rule of Law, means more than just a day in court for the victim or maintaining that the accused be presumed innocent until proven guilty. In fact, as part of the Rule of Law, it means that all persons in a state are bound by and entitled to the equal benefit of laws publicly administered by courts. Thus, our expectation from the Rule of Law should not only be to be governed by, but also be equally benefitted by the law. This insistence on equal benefit of the law forms a part of the thick account of the Rule of Law, which embraces human rights, substantive equality and transformative justice. Substantive equality itself is concerned with not only a redressal of structures of disadvantage, but also a sense of transformative justice, which seeks to overturn these structures and reimagine systems and practices which are defined by equal concern and respect for all.

Abandoning the principles of due process could lead to reform that is thin on these goals and values. This is because the language of rights, especially gender equality, does not exist in a vacuum. It comes from within the package of social justice norms, including a thick account of constitutional principles like the Rule of Law. We cannot selectively apply these values to realise the goal of gender equality.

This matters to the feminist and social movements such as #MeToo, Black Lives Matter, or Occupy, because ultimately, their success depends on their transformative vision. If we are to break the cycle of disadvantage for women and other disadvantaged groups, we need to be able to posit a transformative agenda which is both critical of due process here and now, and appreciative of its normative significance in struggles for equality and justice.

Shreya Atrey is a Lecturer in Law at the University of Bristol Law School

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.