Today, November 12, 2011, marks the 75th anniversary of the momentous Temple Entry Proclamation in Travancore that enabled Dalits to enter temples in the State.
On this day 75 years ago, on November 12, 1936, the Maharajah of Travancore signed the historic Temple Entry Proclamation, and “in one bold stroke, the age long injustice of barring lower castes from entering temple was removed.” And, a “tidal wave of joy and rejoicing passed through every nook and corner” of Travancore. The action attracted attention and admiration from the whole country.
Travancore may not have been the first State, nor its Maharaja the first person, to throw open temples for Dalits. The northern and western parts of India had made a small beginning earlier. But, as the Manchester Guardian observed then, such a concession had never been made on such a large scale before. Today marks the 75th anniversary of this key moment in the struggle for the rights of the socially marginalised.
The impact of the Temple Entry Proclamation was immediate and far-reaching. Not only were temples under the control of the Travancore Maharaja thrown open, but even private temples heeded the call for change. Outside of Travancore, temples in Malabar and the rest of the Madras Presidency felt the cascading effects.
Such an ‘epoch making' event was the culmination of two decades of struggle. In 1919, T.K. Madhavan, a prominent social reformer and the Editor of Deshabhimani, the Malayalam newspaper, took up the issue of temple entry with the Travancore government. So did Kunju Panicker in 1920, and again Madhavan in 1921. But none of this had any effect on the government.
Gandhiji, who was anguished by the ‘very feeble response' of south Indian temples to reform efforts, agreed with Madhavan, during a meeting in 1921, that Kerala was ripe for a temple entry agitation. He insisted on peaceful protest and found there is “no swifter remedy than a real satyagraha properly handled.”
Precursors
Before Trivandrum became the epicentre of the temple entry campaign, protests had begun in Vaikom, in the northern part of Travancore, in 1924. Though this struggle did not succeed in lifting the bar to avarnas, or lower castes, entering the Mahadeva Temple in the town, it managed to open the roads around the temple for their use. The temple entry movement gained momentum after this.
The action then shifted to Trivandrum. The temple entry agitation was formally launched in the city on April 3, 1926. However, before the campaign could move on to the next stage, the Guruvayur Satyagraha started.
On November 1, 1931, a large number of Dalits and upper caste Hindus assembled in Guruvayur to demand that the avarnas be allowed inside the temple. The 10-month-long protest, and fasting by K. Kelappan, popularly known as ‘Kerala Gandhi' (which he dropped on Gandhiji's advice on October 2, 1932), drew national attention to the temple entry movement. The call to open temples for Dalits grew louder.
Shortly afterwards, in November 1932, the Travancore Government appointed a Temple Entry Enquiry Committee. The committee, which submitted its report after a year, did not recommend the opening of temples, but suggested roads and tanks could be opened for all. The reformers rejected the report as it “did not meet the present need.” They insisted that appropriate action alone would meet ‘the test of the hour.'
On May 9, 1936, an All Kerala Temple Entry conference was held in New Theatre Hall near the Trivandrum Central Railway Station, and it resolved to step up the agitation. Speakers at the conference pointed out that of the nearly 30 lakh Hindus living in the State, as many as about 20 lakh were being prevented from entering temples. They decided to convert “all the passive good-will in the State” into an “irresistible demand,” and simultaneously appointed a committee to take up the issue with the Maharaja.
The people of Travancore did not have to wait much longer for the historic change. Five months after the conference was held, on November 12, 1936, a ‘Gazette Extraordinary' was published. In it, “profoundly convinced of the truth,” the Maharaja proclaimed that the temples under his administration would be opened to all Hindus and that no restrictions would be placed on those who wanted to worship at the temple.
In the words of M. Govindan of the All-Kerala Ezhawa Temple-Entry Celebration Committee, the proclamation was received with feelings of “inexpressible delight, unbounded joy and jubilation.” The roles of Sree Narayana Guru and K. Madhavan, the key people who had initiated the movement, were duly remembered on that momentous day.
Predictably, perhaps, there was some resistance. For instance, the trustees of the Koodalmanickam temple at Irinjalakuda were agitated at the prospect of the temple being used by everyone.
The Travancore Proclamation, as Dr. B.R. Ambedkar cautioned, was “not the be-all and end-all of social reforms.” Nor did things dramatically change for the better for Dalits immediately after 1936. But there is no doubt that the Proclamation indeed was a big step in establishing the rights of the lower castes in Kerala, and indeed the nation as a whole.
Keywords: Temple Entry Proclamation, Dalits





In the six decades old Anandwan Parivar at Warora in the district of Chandrapur in Maharashtra, the community anthem is "Work is Worship" and "Confidence must rest in our Wrists". Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Jains, Buddhists and Agnostics have made Anandwan their permanent "life-world" where they breathe the fresh air of solidarity, co-humanity and fellow-feeling for one another without considering the religion, caste, class and other man-made socio-cultural limitations and spiritual deprivations. On their sacred grounds they allow no temples, mosques, churches and such other structures that divide God's marvelous creation. Anandwan citizens are encouraged to live in harmony praising and singing the glory of the Divine Provider for blessing them abundantly.Most of the members of the large community are differently-abled. But they say, "if my one hand is missing, what am I doing with the one I still have" ? Anandwan has found answers to problems fellow mortals keep facing daily.
It is not clear when and how this caste discrimination came in to existence. Veda Vyasa is the single most important person in Hinduism. He was supposed to have composed the Vedas, Mahabharata, Bhagavata, Brhmasutras etc. He was born to Parasara and Satyavati. Satyavati belongs to Fishermans caste. So even Veda Vyasa may not be allowed to enter these temples. Also, a great devotee like Sabari may not be allowed into these temples. Very strange indeed!
Uthapuram, the good beginning! The temples are supposed to be the sacred abodes of God and every faithful should be freely allowed to enter any temple to pay his / her obeisance to the Master Supreme, Moreover, the temples should also be kept open for long hours facilitating the people to visit at their convenience, repent for their sins, meditate silently, seek solace and return home with peace received from above. This we find in respect of almost all the Christian churches where there is no restriction of entry for anyone and all are welcome irrespective of their caste, community, creed, religion, colour or nationality. May be, this is one of the reasons why Christianity has spread far and wide, withstood onslaught down the ages and stands tall among the religions of the world. Let Uthapuram be the good beginning and bring peace and harmony among people.
A good way to combat the problem, which still seems to be lurking in certain areas is to initiate a scholarly debate on 'avarnas'. We need to examine how and when this originated, and how one who is regarded as a Hindu would fall under 'avarna' which is technically not possible. In addition, those Brahmins who have abandoned their Anusthana and have taken up professional life must be ready to formally accept a revision of their varna. This suggestion is neither new nor radical, that used to happen during the mideaval times when Brahmins started ruling states, they were formally initiated to a Kshatriya varna. Next big reform would be for politicians from Municipal Councilor level to MP should abandon all business interests and formally take up Kshatriya varna - where they will neither hold any land, nor indulge in business activity - but be solely devoted to their law-maker duties. These two changes would restablish the Brahmin and Kshatriya varnas. Sudra and Vaisya are quite fine.
Discrimination on the basis of caste, religion, economic status, sex is alive and well all over India. it is evil to keep the temple doors closed for the so called low caste people whom Gandhi called the children of Hari. It is high time that temple authorities keep the doors open to all. The evil practise of honoring politicians, the rich and the powerful in the temple should be stopped. It was a blatant misuse of power when Jeyalalitha was honored in Kumbabhishekam in Kumbakonam years ago. I see chef Jacob cooking in Hindu temple premises and the priests tasting his dishes in Sun TV's "Ahaha enna rusi". Let everyone keep the song "vaishnava janatho" alive
Unfortunately after 75 years also some sort discrimination is still there in Villages.Lower caste people still not allowed inside temple. Yeah it was changed in cities and some naming temple.
It should be remembered that it was not only Dalits but various middle castes like Ezhavas that were prevented entry into the temple. Perhaps upto 80% of the Hindu population were prevented access. All these people were considered Hindus, but were placed outside the caste system.
And on November 10, 2011, Dalits in a village in Tamil Nadu get entry to a temple, accompanied by the wails of upper caste women, not all of who were happy with this defilement of the sacred precincts. 1937 to 2011 - seventyfive years. How fast India progresses! (Consider the fact that the Temple Entry Proclamation took place in a state that Swami Vivakananda termed a lunatic asylum on account of its rigid caste system). Meenakshipuram in 1981 came and went as a punctuation mark, when Hindu organizations woke up to the fact that the low-caste people also aspired to dignity. They said, "We converted as we were not respected by other caste Hindus". Unfortunately, Hindu awakening was directed more at the threats from rival soul-detergent vendors and the iniquities in those religious communities than in cleaning its own Augean stables. In Orissa, also part of India, denial of temple entry to "untouchables" attracts no attention unless the "untouchable" is a MP (PL Punia in June 2011).
Please Email the Editor