The power of incentives

Without strong institutions, they can have brutal consequences

April 17, 2018 12:15 am | Updated 12:28 am IST

Vector Single Sketch Closed Postal Envelope

Vector Single Sketch Closed Postal Envelope

One of the fundamental principles used by economists to understand the world is that people respond to incentives. Good incentives push people to do things that are beneficial to society, while bad incentives have the opposite effect.

“The perils of high-powered incentives”, a 2018 paper by a team of researchers including Daron Acemoglu, James Robinson et al, in the National Bureau of Economic Research , takes the case of how bad incentives can lead to some very brutal consequences. In the paper, the authors first elaborate on how cash and other perks have historically been offered as incentives to members of various militaries across the world to deal with enemy forces. Then they look at the particular case of Colombia’s anti-insurgency strategy against the leftist guerrillas after the election of Alvaro Uribe as the country’s President in 2002. The new government offered a variety of incentives to its soldiers in order to prod them to kill and maim as many enemy forces as possible. One of the incentives, a soldier said, was that Colombian military personnel could earn as much as 15 days of vacation by killing guerrillas. Promotions and other perks offered to colonels also depended on the number of killings carried out by their soldiers.

While the stated goal of the government’s incentive scheme was to deal with the guerrillas, the authors find that it also pushed soldiers to engage in fake killings of innocent civilians just to claim their incentives. This was particularly the case in regions where there were fewer judicial checks on errant soldiers. Colombia’s military clearly did not have any monetary or other material incentives to care about the human rights of civilians, so it was no surprise that they killed innocent people. The more relevant question to ask is why the government failed to strengthen institutions meant to keep a check on soldiers. It may be that the government itself, for whatever reason, had no material incentive to tackle the unintended effects of its policy on ordinary civilians. The authors thus discourage the use of high-powered incentives in countries with weak institutions.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.