A belief that heaven or an afterlife awaits us is a “fairy story” for people afraid of death, Stephen Hawking has said.
In a dismissal that underlines his firm rejection of religious comforts, Britain's most eminent scientist said there was nothing beyond the moment when the brain flickers for the final time.
Mr. Hawking, who was diagnosed with motor neurone disease at the age of 21, shared his thoughts on death, human purpose and our chance existence in an exclusive interview with the Guardian on May 16.
The incurable illness was expected to kill Mr. Hawking within a few years of its symptoms arising, an outlook that turned the young scientist to Wagner, but ultimately led him to enjoy life more, he has said, despite the cloud hanging over his future.
“I have lived with the prospect of an early death for the last 49 years. I'm not afraid of death, but I'm in no hurry to die. I have so much I want to do first,” he said.
“I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark,” he added.
Beyond his book
Mr. Hawking's latest comments go beyond those laid out in his 2010 book, The Grand Design, in which he asserts there is no need for a creator to explain the existence of the universe.
The book provoked a backlash from some religious leaders, including the chief rabbi, Lord Sacks, who accused Mr. Hawking of an “elementary fallacy” of logic.
The 69-year-old physicist fell seriously ill after a lecture tour in the U.S. in 2009 and was taken to Addenbrookes Hospital in an episode that sparked grave concerns for his health. He has since returned to his Cambridge department as director of research.
The physicist's remarks draw a stark line between the use of God as a metaphor and the belief in an omniscient creator whose hands guide the workings of the cosmos.
In his bestselling 1988 book, A Brief History of Time, Hawking drew on the device so beloved of Einstein, when he described what it would mean for scientists to develop a “theory of everything” — a set of equations that described every particle and force in the entire universe. “It would be the ultimate triumph of human reason — for then we should know the mind of God,” he wrote.
The book sold a reported nine million copies and propelled the physicist to instant stardom. His fame has led to guest roles in The Simpsons, Star Trek: The Next Generation and Red Dwarf. One of his greatest achievements in physics is a theory that describes how black holes emit radiation.
In the interview, Hawking rejected the notion of life beyond death and emphasised the need to fulfil our potential on Earth by making good use of our lives. In answer to a question on how we should live, he said, simply: “We should seek the greatest value of our action.” In answering another, he wrote of the beauty of science, such as the exquisite double helix of DNA in biology, or the fundamental equations of physics.
Mr. Hawking responded to questions posed by the Guardian and a reader ahead of a lecture [since over on May 17], at the Google Zeitgeist meeting in London, in which he addressed the question: “Why are we here?” In the talk, he argued that tiny quantum fluctuations in the very early universe became the seeds from which galaxies, stars, and ultimately human life, emerged. “Science predicts that many different kinds of universe will be spontaneously created out of nothing. It is a matter of chance which we are in,” he said.
Mr. Hawking suggested that with modern space-based instruments, such as the European Space Agency's Planck mission, it may be possible to spot ancient fingerprints in the light left over from the earliest moments of the universe and work out how our own place in space came to be.
M-theory
His talk focused on M-theory, a broad mathematical framework that encompasses string theory, which is regarded by many physicists as the best hope yet of developing a theory of everything.
M-theory demands a universe with 11 dimensions, including a dimension of time and the three familiar spatial dimensions. The rest are curled up too small for us to see.
Evidence in support of M-theory might also come from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at Cern, the European particle physics laboratory near Geneva.
One possibility predicted by M-theory is supersymmetry, an idea that says fundamental particles have heavy — and as yet undiscovered — twins, with curious names such as selectrons and squarks.
Confirmation of supersymmetry would be a shot in the arm for M-theory and help physicists explain how each forces at work in the universe arose from one super-force at the dawn of time.
Another potential discovery at the LHC, that of the elusive Higgs boson, which is thought to give mass to elementary particles, might be less welcome to Mr. Hawking, who has a long-standing bet that the long-sought entity will never be found at the laboratory.
Other speakers at the London event, included the chancellor, George Osborne, and the Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz.
A Conversation
What is the value in knowing “Why are we here?”
The universe is governed by science. But science tells us that we can’t solve the equations, directly in the abstract. We need to use the effective theory of Darwinian natural selection of those societies most likely to survive. We assign them higher value.
You’ve said there is no reason to invoke God to light the blue touchpaper. Is our existence all down to luck?
Science predicts that many different kinds of universe will be spontaneously created out of nothing. It is a matter of chance which we are in.
So here we are. What should we do?
We should seek the greatest value of our action.
You had a health scare and spent time in hospital in 2009. What, if anything, do you fear about death?
I have lived with the prospect of an early death for the last 49 years. I’m not afraid of death, but I’m in no hurry to die. I have so much I want to do first. I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark.
What are the things you find most beautiful in science?
Science is beautiful when it makes simple explanations of phenomena or connections between different observations. Examples include the double helix in biology, and the fundamental equations of physics.
Copyright: Guardian News & Media 2011
Keywords: Stephen Hawking, astrophysics, quarks, Planck mission





The concept of no god is not for everyone.
It takes a lot of intelligence to grasp this reality.
When theists see death they are noncomplacent in accepting medicine to save their lives yet medicine is firmly based on evolution and DNA theory.
In an article titled 'The Buddha and the future of his religion' in the Mahabodi Journal 1951, Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar said with foresight that if the modern world awakened by science must have a religion then that religion must must satisfy 4 conditions. It must supply a moral force to self govern a society . It must be in accord with science. It must be founded on the principles of liberty, equality and fraternity and it should never ennoble or sanctify poverty. He said "Religion is bound to lose its respect and therefore become a subject of ridicule and thereby not merely lose its force as a governing principle of life but might in the course of time disintegrate and lapse if it's not in accord with science. In other words, religion, if it is to function, must be in accord with reason which is another name of science."
Thank you The Hindu. It prodded me to buy the book 'The Grand Design' and read it too. It is a fact that most of the physics despite being explained by Stephen Hawking is in simple language goes above our heads, particularly when issues like particles, M-Theory and Theory of Everything are dealt with.. Yet Hawking's latest book 'The Grand Design' is a clssic and sets the frontiers of adventure in exploring from cosmos to bosons and protons. It presents the great writer's stand on God in convincing terms while elucidating the scientific exploration carried out so far and setting out the unfinished task in proving M-Theory and Theory of Everything etc.His philosophy as brought in the above article by the Hindu (congratulations) is enlightening. Stephen Hawking is unequivocal in declaring that it is not necessary to invoke God as a creator of universe since universes can create themselves and also in the conduct of affairs of men and particles (we are also made of particles) . He further explains that we have no model independent test of reality to convince us about the existence or otherwise of a superrnatural power and lastly we do not have as yet any test to say whether there are no other conscious beings other than us .How humbling is the thought that when we die we are like the broken PCs. It is a relief to know there is no one waiting there for us and to pass a verdict 'Gulity' or 'Not Guilty'.
Please Email the Editor