SEARCH

Opinion » Comment

Updated: January 16, 2013 01:30 IST

Pushed into the abyss

    Anuj Srivas
    Vasudevan Mukunth
Comment (10)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
AP

While Aaron Swartz’s life was proof that the U.S. is still the world’s most innovative society, his death shows that the line between what is acceptable and what is not is thin

In July, 2011, Aaron Swartz was indicted by the district of Massachusetts for allegedly stealing more than 4.8 million articles from the online academic literature repository JSTOR via the computer network at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was charged with, among others, wire-fraud, computer-fraud, obtaining information from a protected computer, and criminal forfeiture.

After paying a $100,000-bond for release, he was expected to stand trial in early 2013 to face the charges and, if found guilty, a 35-year prison sentence and $1 million in fines. More than the likelihood of the sentence, however, what rankled him most was that he was labelled a “felon” by his government.

On January 11, Friday, Swartz’s fight, against information localisation as well as the label given to him, ended when he hung himself in his New York apartment. He was only 26. At the time of his death, JSTOR did not intend to press charges and had decided to release 4.5 million of its articles into the public domain. It seems as though this crime had no victims.

But, he was so much more than an alleged thief of intellectual property. His life was a perfect snapshot of the American Dream. But the nature of his demise shows that dreams are not always what they seem.

Co-author of RSS

At the age of 14, Swartz became a co-author of the RSS (Rich Site Summary) 1.0 specification, now a widely used method for subscribing to web content. He went on to attend Stanford University, dropped out, founded a popular social news website and then sold it — leaving him a near millionaire a few days short of his 20th birthday.

A recurring theme in his life and work, however, were issues of internet freedom and public access to information, which led him to political activism. An activist organisation he founded campaigned heavily against the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) bill, and eventually killed it. If passed, SOPA would have affected much of the world’s browsing.

At a time that is rife with talk of American decline, Swartz’s life reminds us that for now, the United States still remains the most innovative society on Earth, while his death tells us that it is also a place where envelope pushers discover, sometimes too late, that the line between what is acceptable and what is not is very thin.

The charges that he faced, in the last two years before his death, highlight the misunderstood nature of digital activism — an issue that has lessons for India. For instance, with Section 66A of the Indian IT Act in place, there is little chance of organising an online protest and blackout on par with the one that took place over the SOPA bill.

While civil disobedience and street protests usually carry light penalties, why should Swartz have faced long-term incarceration just because he used a computer instead? In an age of Twitter protests and online blackouts, his death sheds light on the disparities that digital activism is subjected to.

His act of trying to liberate millions of scholarly articles was undoubtedly political activism. But had he undertaken such an act in the physical world, he would have faced only light penalties for trespassing as part of a political protest. One could even argue that MIT encouraged such free exchange of information — it is no secret that its campus network has long been extraordinarily open with minimal security.

What then was the point of the public prosecutors highlighting his intent to profit from stolen property worth “millions of dollars” when Swartz’s only aim was to make them public as a statement on the problems facing the academic publishing industry? After all, any academic would tell you that there is no way to profit off a hoard of scientific literature unless you dammed the flow and then released it per payment.

In fact, JSTOR’s decision to not press charges against him came only after they had reclaimed their “stolen” articles — even though Laura Brown, the managing director of JSTOR, had announced in September 2011, that journal content from 500,000 articles would be released for free public viewing and download. In the meantime, Swartz was made to face 13 charges anyway.

Assuming the charges are reasonable at all, his demise will then mean that the gap between those who hold onto information and those who would use it is spanned only by what the government thinks is criminal. That the hammer fell so heavily on someone who tried to bridge this gap is tragic. Worse, long-drawn, expensive court cases are becoming roadblocks on the path towards change, especially when they involve prosecutors incapable of judging the difference between innovation and damage on the digital frontier. It doesn’t help that it also neatly avoids the aura of illegitimacy that imprisoning peaceful activists would have for any government.

Today, Aaron Swartz is dead. All that it took to push a brilliant mind over the edge was a case threatening to wipe out his fortunes and ruin the rest of his life. In the words of Lawrence Lessig, American academic activist, and his former mentor at the Harvard University Edmond J. Safra Centre for Ethics: “Somehow, we need to get beyond the ‘I’m right so I’m right to nuke you’ ethics of our time. That begins with one word: Shame.”

anuj.s@thehindu.co.in

vasudevan.m@thehindu.co.in

More In: Comment | Opinion

There needs to be redefining of digital activism and on ground activism.
Just because our interpretation of these two forms are not aligning
together is leading to a loss of intellectual from the society is not a
thing to overlook.We are living in a world where someone is committing
suicide and someone like Assange is living a secluded life due to
digital activism.

from:  mohit kumar
Posted on: Jan 16, 2013 at 17:35 IST

The article did not mention Mass Senator Ortiz's statement "A robbery is a robberry either if it is information/computer/money related." and just before the day Aaron committed suicide she went on to increase the number of counts to 45 from 13 which would eventually incarcenate Aaron for 35 years. She was asked to stepback from senator post by WhiteHouse after Aaron's death sadly Aaron cant be brought back to life. RIP Aaron, you lived for what you stand for!!

from:  Venu Gopal Reddy Muvva
Posted on: Jan 16, 2013 at 16:46 IST

@Raju Ram - Yes, we think MIT also played a role in it, but we thought
the article's focus should remain mostly on Aaron's prosecution and not
who headed it, and its impact. For that matter, we also left out a
mention of the attitude of Ms. Carmen Ortiz, the US Attorney for the
district of MA and lead prosecutor. JSTOR, however, had to be mentioned
because Aaron's work has involved them in the past as well.

Thanks for your comment. :)

from:  Vasudevan Mukunth
Posted on: Jan 16, 2013 at 16:34 IST

His name Aaron,in Hebrew stands for teacher or a mountain of strentgh and things lofty.His surname Schwarz has meanings as varied as dark,black,strong,opaque,
he seems to have lived as named.A lofty soul,a teacher,who battled dark black clouds of depression.a troubled genius.

from:  parthosarothy mukherji
Posted on: Jan 16, 2013 at 15:30 IST

MIT played a bigger role in Aaron's suicide, why article is silent about it?

from:  Raju Ram
Posted on: Jan 16, 2013 at 14:15 IST

Its sad..very sad..such a bright person was compelled to commit
suicide..

from:  Swati Dahal
Posted on: Jan 16, 2013 at 14:01 IST

It is really unfortunate to witness this. A person trying to make
information free to the world is being prosecuted ,even though no
private motives behind it..Shame on us.

from:  Abhinav
Posted on: Jan 16, 2013 at 11:11 IST

What a Brilliant boy and an unfortunate end."The line between,what is
acceptable and what is not is thin"is a very apt observation on the
happenings these days.In order to tune one's mind to the right side
always,one should turn inside to seek the "Light",from within.Looking
'out' for knowledge is akin, to searching a coin under a street
light,when the subject knows it dropped out of his shirt,in the next
street,but there is better light here!!!

from:  K P Natarajan
Posted on: Jan 16, 2013 at 09:33 IST

Its very saddening to know a young inspiring activist made to end his
life for principles he belived to make this world more just and
equitable. Hope people will remember his work and activism. RIP-Aaron
Swartz.

from:  yasala naresh
Posted on: Jan 16, 2013 at 09:27 IST

The tragic part about the 35 year long sentence is that, murderers face
a sentence lesser than 35 years. Makes you wonder who is that the
government is there to protect.

from:  Vignesh
Posted on: Jan 16, 2013 at 06:15 IST
Show all comments
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in Comment

Progress has been made in the negotiations on the boundary question, and the two sides have worked together to maintain peace and tranquillity in the border area. Picture shows the India-China border in Arunachal Pradesh. Photo: AP

Towards an Asian century of prosperity

The combination of the world’s factory and the world’s back office will produce the most competitive production base, writes Xi Jinping, President of China »