Narayanan's fall is Chidambaram's rise

"Narayanan's replacement with a career diplomat comports with Chidambaram's reform agenda" Timothy Roemer

March 17, 2011 11:36 pm | Updated March 18, 2011 04:06 am IST - CHENNAI

M.K. Narayanan's departure and Shivshankar Menon's appointment as National Security Adviser were further signals of Home Minister P. Chidambaram's “growing power relative to other foreign policy officials.”

A cable dated January 22, 2010 from United States Ambassador Timothy Roemer ( >244959: confidential ) to Washington said that Mr. Narayanan's replacement by a career diplomat “lacking background in internal security, comports with Minister Chidambaram's reform agenda” — which is to consolidate all intelligence, internal security and counter-terrorism functions under a single entity that reported to him.

Mr. Roemer noted that Mr. Chidambaram appeared to be backed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, “despite [the former] lacking a strong electoral base.” The envoy added: “However, Chidambaram's management style and rapid ascent to power has rubbed many within his own party the wrong way.”

Mr. Roemer said: “Menon's appointment [as NSA] also signals that the Prime Minister's Office will remain the focal point for key strategic relationships at the expense of the Ministry of External Affairs under S.M. Krishna, thought to be largely a figurehead.”

Striking a positive note while discussing Mr. Menon, the cable said that while the career diplomat, the grandson of India's first Foreign Secretary, was “not reflexively pro-American,” he saw the strategic value of the U.S.-India relationship.

Mr. Roemer observed: “He took a hard line on a variety of issues over the course of the civil nuclear cooperation agreement negotiations, including at a critical moment during the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) deliberations, but also skillfully piloted critical decisions through the Indian bureaucracy. He expressed surprise that the FBI role in the investigation into the 26/11 Mumbai attacks did not generate more controversy, but thus reassured, later advocated a more robust cooperative relationship on counterterrorism.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.