Israel profiting from occupation, says report

Israeli firms profit from mining and quarrying in the West Bank.

October 01, 2011 12:14 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:08 pm IST

A Palestinian  farmer holds olives collected from broken olive tree branches in the village of Qusra. in the northern West Bank, Saturday,  Sept. 10, 2011. According to Palestinian residents, some 50 olive trees were uprooted  by Jewish settlers from a nearby settlement Saturday. (AP Photo/Nasser Ishtayeh)

A Palestinian farmer holds olives collected from broken olive tree branches in the village of Qusra. in the northern West Bank, Saturday, Sept. 10, 2011. According to Palestinian residents, some 50 olive trees were uprooted by Jewish settlers from a nearby settlement Saturday. (AP Photo/Nasser Ishtayeh)

Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza deprives the Palestinian economy of almost £4.4 billion a year, equivalent to about 85 per cent of the nominal gross domestic product of Palestine, according to a report published in Ramallah on Thursday.

As well as its detrimental effect on the Palestinian economy, the “occupation enterprise” allows the state of Israel and commercial firms to profit from Palestinian natural resources and tourist potential, the report said.

“No matter what the Palestinian people achieve by our own efforts, the occupation prevents us achieving our potential as a free people in our own country,” said Hasan Abu Libdeh, Economy Minister in the Palestinian Authority, introducing the report. “It should be clear to the international community that one reason for Israel's refusal to act in good faith as a partner for peace is the profits it makes as an occupying power.” Without the occupation, the Palestinian economy would be almost twice as large as it is and would be able to reduce its dependence on donor funding from the international community, according to the report.

Compiled by the Economy Ministry and the independent thinktank Applied Research Institute-Jerusalem, the report was the first attempt to quantify the annual cost of the occupation to the Palestinian economy. “The total cost which we have been able to measure was $6.897 billion in 2010, a staggering 84.9 per cent of the total estimated Palestinian GDP,” it said.

“The majority of these costs do not have any relationship with security concerns but, rather, come from the heavy restrictions imposed on the Palestinians in the access to their own natural resources, many of which are exploited by Israel itself,” the report continued.

The occupation “imposes a myriad of restrictions on the Palestinian economy. It prevents Palestinians from accessing much of their land and from exploiting most of their natural resources; it isolates Palestinians from global markets, and fragments their territory into small, badly connected ‘cantons',” the report said.

The blockade of Gaza placed severe restrictions on imports and exports, on which the economy was highly dependent. Electricity and water production was unable to meet demand from industry and agriculture owing to damaged infrastructure and a shortage of parts and materials.

Shelling had destroyed physical assets and infrastructure.

Restrictions on the import to both the West Bank and Gaza of goods deemed as “dual use”, such as chemicals and fertilisers which Israel says could be used in the manufacture of weapons, had severely affected manufacturing and agriculture.

Limits on movement for both goods and labour within the West Bank were a critical economic constraint. The report compared the distance of direct routes between West Bank towns and cities and the routes Palestinians are required to take. For example, the distance between the city of Nablus in the north of the West Bank and al-Jiftlik in the Jordan Valley was 58km by the most direct route, but the route Palestinians were forced to take was 172 km.

Restrictions on Palestinian access to the Dead Sea meant a loss in income from the extraction of minerals and salts, and from tourism, from which Israel benefited economically. Dead Sea beauty and skin care products, manufactured and marketed by Israeli companies, were worth $150 million a year, the report said.

Israeli businesses also profited from mining and quarrying in the West Bank. West Bank water resources were diverted to Israeli settlements, industry and agriculture. Israel took 10 times as much water from the three West Bank aquifers as the Palestinians, the report said.

Around 2.5 million trees, including olive groves, had been uprooted since 1967.

Palestinian farmers had lost land or could no longer access it. “Six hundred and twenty thousand settlers [in the West Bank and East Jerusalem] cultivate 64,000 dunams of land. Four million Palestinians in the West Bank only cultivate 100,000 dunams,” said Abu Libdeh. One dunam is around 1,000 square metres.

“As we prepare for statehood we want to build a sustainable and viable Palestine which is economically feasible, environmentally sound and socially legitimate,” he said. Meanwhile, the Palestinian leadership said on Thursday there were “encouraging elements” in the statement issued by the Middle East Quartet last week in an attempt to get the parties to return to talks. “We call on Israel to announce its commitment to the principles and points of reference [the statement] identifies,” said senior official Yasser Abed Rabbo, speaking after a meeting of the Palestine Liberation Organisation's executive committee.

“We consider the Quartet's reference to the obligations of the Palestinian and Israeli sides under the Road Map and the call to avoid provocative acts as a clear call for a definitive halt to settlement activity in all its forms, which is an encouraging sign.” The Israeli Cabinet met on Tuesday to consider the statement but was unable to agree on a response. — © Guardian Newspapers Limited, 2011

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.