Harsh Mander responds:

July 04, 2013 12:03 am | Updated June 04, 2016 10:59 am IST

I agree fully with Kalpana Kannabiran — for whom I have great regard — that there is enormous, unacknowledged violence in the poverty and oppression of the everyday. But I am convinced still that retaliatory violence will not remedy but only further brutalise society, and more deeply entrench violence. The violence and injustice of the state, of poverty, caste, gender and communalism, but also of non-state actors, need to be resisted, but with non-violence and democracy.

I agree also that sympathy with Maoism is not a crime. But I am emphatically not sympathetic to Maoism, or any form of violence including state violence in particular. I know this is not a popular position with many people with whom I agree on most other issues. This is why I feel I must place the reasons for this opposition firmly in the public domain, to try to contribute a little to the morally and politically important debate about the best ways to resist injustice and build a more just and humane world.

(Harsh Mander is a social worker.)

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.