For surveillance curbs

December 21, 2013 12:17 am | Updated 12:17 am IST

The national debate over U.S. government surveillance, in a sharp and unexpected shift, seems to be turning in favour of reining in the National Security Agency’s expansive spying powers at home and abroad.

In the span of just a few days, a federal judge has ruled that the NSA’s telephone records were unconstitutional, a presidential advisory panel recommended sweeping changes to the agency, and pressure is rising on President Barack Obama to scale back the controversial programmes.

Russian President Vladimir Putin said surveillance efforts are necessary to fight terrorism and “not a cause for repentance,” but they should be limited by clear rules.

Even the President’s argument that the data collection is to needed to protect the U.S. from attacks has been undermined by the Federal Judge Richard Leon, who said there is little evidence that the collection, even if constitutional, prevented attacks. An intelligence advisory panel with access to classified information came to the same conclusion in its 300-page report.

However, Mr. Obama, albeit facing much public criticism, is in no way obligated to make any substantial changes.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.