The ajaat, a once proud anti-caste social reform movement, have been reduced to an isolated group viewed as something like a caste themselves.
Amitabh Bachchan says that if ever asked about his caste by Census enumerators, his answer would be: Caste – Indian. That, of course, would do little more than stoke the media's bollywood feeding frenzy yet again. Shyam Maharaj is no Bachchan. Nor is his brother, Chaitanya Prabhu. But they and the followers of their fraternity will likely throw up far more complex answers — and questions — if Census enumerators do finally pop that query on caste. “Our answer: we are ajaat. Here is my school leaving certificate to prove that. But you can write what you like,” Prabhu tells us at his house in Mangrul (Dastgir) village of Amravati district.
Ajaat: this literally means ones without caste. The ajaat was a bold social movement of the 1920s and '30s that at its peak had tens of thousands of committed followers in what are present-day Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. It was led by the colourful and eccentric social reformer Ganpati Bhabhutkar better known as Ganpati Maharaj. Chaitanya Prabhu and Shyam Maharaj are his surviving grandsons. Apart from the usual anti-liquor and anti-violence norms of such movements, Ganpati Maharaj threw in others. He attacked caste frontally. Many stopped idol worship at his call. He pressed for gender equality and even railed against private property. And, in the 1930s, he and his followers declared themselves as ‘ajaat.'
His inter-caste dining drive raised hackles in the villages he worked in. As one of his disciples P. L. Nimkar put it: “he would ask his followers from all castes to bring cooked food from their homes. This, he would mix up totally and distribute the mix as prasad.” Caste was his great target. “Inter-caste weddings and widow remarriage — that's what he sought and achieved,” says Prabhu. “In our own family, from granddad to us, we married into eleven different castes, from brahmins to dalits. In our extended family there have been scores of such weddings. Ganpati Maharaj himself had such a marriage.” He also “created the religion of ‘maanav' (humanity) and opened the temple here to dalits, offending the upper castes,” says Shyam Maharaj. “They filed cases against him and no one would touch his case. All the vakils here at the time were brahmins.”
The movement waned over years, as some followers left on the caste issue, and with its Gurus's death in 1944. (He is buried at a community centre he built here decades ago, just opposite Prabhu's home). Still, it remained known and respected for some time after independence. “See my school leaving certificate,” says Prabhu, showing it to us. “As late as the 1960s, even the ‘70s, we still got certificates calling us ajaat. Now, schools and colleges say they've never heard of us and won't give our children admission.” The surviving ajaat are not doing too well. Shyam and Prabhu just about make ends meet as petty agricultural traders.
Forgotten by the late ‘70s, the ajaat were re-discovered some years ago by Nagpur journalists Atul Pandey and Jaideep Hardikar who wrote about their plight in Marathi and English respectively. Their reports sparked a Maharashtra government move to help them. But that died with the exit of the one senior official who had shown interest in the matter.
Ajaat candidates can't contest panchayat polls. Poll officials refuse to accept their forms — which state no caste. “Ajaat folk can't get ration cards without a huge struggle,” says Prabhu. College admissions, scholarships and government jobs elude them for the same reasons. Other villagers won't marry into these families now as their caste status lacks clarity. In short, the followers of a once proud anti-caste reform movement have been reduced to a couple of thousand people viewed as something like a caste themselves.
“My niece Sunaina could not get into college,” says Prabhu. “The college said: ‘we don't recognise this ajaat. Bring us a proper caste certificate and we'll admit her'.” His nephew Manoj who did finally make it to college says: “They treat us as an oddity there. There were no scholarships for any of us. No one there believes such a thing as ajaat exists.” A restless younger generation feels imprisoned by the past. Many of the ajaat, including Prabhu's family, have faced the ignominy of having to trace out an ancestor whose caste could be clearly proven.
“Imagine our humiliation,” he says. “We have to take out caste certificates for our children.” Not easy, given the generations of inter-caste marriages these families have seen. And even the ledger of the village kotwal lists them as ‘ajaat.' Some have had to trace a great grandfather whose caste could be established. “To recover and rebuild those old records is a horrible job,” says Prabhu. “The authorities suspect us of concealing things and faking our caste. And it hurts us like anything to make these caste certificates. But without them our children are truly stuck.” Sadly, they had no choice but to trace out the caste origin of anti-caste crusader Ganpati Maharaj himself. That was needed for his great-grandchildren.
Quite a few of the remaining 2,000 or so ajaat gather at that centre in this village in November each year. “Now there is only one such family we have contact with in Madhya Pradesh,” says a glum Prabhu. The rest are in Maharashtra. “Only 105 are formally registered with our body, the ajaatiya maanav sanstha. But far more than that come to our annual meeting. However, consider that we once had 60,000 members in this movement.”
“We need a much more comprehensive survey of caste than the mere introduction of a question in the Census will permit,” says economist Dr. K. Nagaraj (formerly with the Madras Institute of Development Studies) who has worked on the subject. “That we need caste data is beyond doubt. But we need that data in a frame that captures the huge diversity, location-specific nature, and the many other complexities of caste. A single question in the 2011 census will not achieve that. This is perhaps a job for the National Sample Survey and its team of trained investigators with much advance preparation.”
So what happens if that enumerator does come around to your house with the question on caste? “Believe me,” says Prabhu, “It will confuse him. I think they should create a different category in the Census for people like us. We must declare who we are. We have fought against everything that stands for caste. But in this society, caste is in everything.”
Keywords: Social reform, anti-caste movement, Ajaat





A movement with contradictions will meet the same fate. Buddha is worshipped today even though he spent his life convincing his followers against idol worship. If you try to cure symptoms the disease will reappear in some other form. That is what has happened in this case apparently. Why did they 'name' their category as 'Ajaat'? This was their first contradiction. It appears that they were further trapped into their own arguments when they wanted to use their earlier caste identity to avail the benefits of reservation policy. Forms generally have columns asking for information about a candidate's Religion and Caste category. I see problem only if someone would like to write 'Ajaat' as his/her religion as no one will accept that. As all these members must have earlier belonged to different castes of only 'Hindu' religion, I see no problem for them to be identified with Hindu religion. Further, caste category is generally classified as General, OBC, SC, ST and certificate is never demanded if one chooses 'General', but of course for any other choice one will always have to submit a caste certificate indicating that his/her caste belongs to the approved list. I hope the way RSS tries to handle this problem is still a better approach as it makes effort to put all the castes at par without asking them to lose their caste identity. Although their approach does not work in BJP like political establishments.
An article which should wake up our politicians. The RSS wants a casteless society, yet the BJP could not support its idea. The census should accept 'ajaat' as a description of caste. Even if there are only a few thousand ajaats in the country, it is a beginning to form a casteless society. After all when will we throw away the shackles of caste in our country.
It is great and this movement "Ajaat" needs to be revived. It is a pity that many social reform movements like Ajaat have become dormant. India needs these movements once again.
The 'Ajaat' concept is really very good. What is happening with 'Ajaat' people is totally unfair and even illegal. I just don't understand how can someone refuse to take admission of their children just because they don't belong to any cast. Don't you guys think that this religion, cast-ism and such kind of stuff is blocking our development ???
I personally think we should appreciate this 'Ajaat' community.
It is astonishing that the Indian state issues a "a caste certificate"
Of all Indian English newspapers, I like only "Hindu" & Sainath, the person behind. Very informative. Keep up good work.
It is a pleasant surprise to us that ajaat has come to lime light.During these long years the institution like ajaat should have social and political recognition. But it did not.However today's resentment is mainly due to economical deprivation.Government should abandon policy of cast calculation and should reserve the facilities as per economic status of the society.
First of all, a very well written piece (as usual) by P Sainath.
Personally, I am very uncomfortable with reducing the Indian identity to a caste label. Being Indian cannot and should not be used as a caste identity - the last thing we need is another pointless caste label.
People like Mr Bachan, and people who have crawled under a blanket that they call 'National Interest' seem to think that switching labels is a way off getting rid of labels.
I like the 'ajaat' concept - more honest with the way it grapples with complexities of caste. Middle class and the upwardly mobile can easily brush off caste labels, not the case for the rest of the country.
I am befuddled by the fact why someone would be refused admission in college because they call themselves 'ajaat',I can understand if they were applying for a reserved seat which paradoxically would defy the very purpose of this 'ajaatness'. If this is happening it is simply illegal,anyways,caste is a serious reality.In the schools we are taught about it with a certain idealism,in a negative light even.However,as we grow older it becomes a very real phenomenon,good or bad-I don't know.It is important we learn to live with our identities,while allowing requisite space to everyone else.Reducing caste imbalances requires measured policy driven measures,populist movements like 'ajaat' or similar,as noble as their intentions might be,are unlikely to succeed.The whole Indian caste is nothing more than immaturity and populism at its worst.
I did not know these type of people are also living in my country. Thanks Sainath.
Splendid Article and truly informative as well as insightful. Bollywood gimmickry will be reported widely in English press and not articles of this nature. Thanks P. Sainath and The Hindu.
It's ironical that the plight of 'Ajaat' is similar to 'Achuth'. However, both struggle for the same thing i.e. elimination of the caste identity. I truly wish that surveyor doesn't come to ask that simple question an answer of which will further confuse us and serve no purpose.
Please Email the Editor