Narasimha Rao was the second choice after Shankar Dayal Sharma’s staggering refusal to take up the top post
Jawaharlal Nehru and P.V. Narasimha Rao do not have much in common except that both were intellectuals. Nehru’s intellectualism was shaped by Harrow, Cambridge and Lincoln’s Inn; by Bernard Shaw, Russell, the Fabians. He probably dreamt in English. The title of his book, The Discovery of India,is a disarming confession of his need for discovering the land of his birth.
P.V. Narasimha Rao, whose 91st birth anniversary was marked last week, came from a humble home. His intellectual centre was India. Unlike Nehru his knowledge of Sanskrit was profound. His speech on Mahatma Gandhi at Unesco on May 11, 1995 was a masterpiece. One has only to read his address “India’s Cultural Influence on Western Europe since the Age of Romanticism” given at Alpach, Austria on June 19, 1983 to realise that PV was a man of learning, a scholar, a linguist and a thinker of the first order. His roots were deep in the spiritual and religious soil of India. He did not need to Discover India.
An astute man
He used one word where two might do. He once told me that some things should be left unsaid. His ataraxy ensured serene calmness. At the same time he was no saint. His private life inclined towards passion and sensuality. Very few were privy to this aspect of his life. He was astute, crafty, patient;also capable of radioactive sarcasm. He smiled without a smile. Nehru had a temper, PV a temperament.
In early 1990, he had decided to retire from politics. He had made all arrangements to go back to Hyderabad.
On May 21, 1991 Rajiv Gandhi was devastatingly cut down in the prime of his life. He had come to Bharatpur, my constituency, to help me in the 1991 election on May 16. He arrived after midnight, accompanied by his close friend Suman Dubey. A nicer and self effacing man one could seldom find. The next day we drove to Agra. That was the last time I saw him. I wrote in an article two days later, “The Country weeps. The World mourns. I feel a terrible emptiness within and there is no drowning this sorrow. At the moment our consolations are few, our torments many. When the tears have dried the anger subsided, the horror diminished, the scar will remain. So will the heart ache.”
For his funeral many world leaders arrived in Delhi — Vice-President Dan Quayle from the United States, Prince Charles from the U.K, Yassir Arafat, Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, the King of Bhutan, the Deputy Prime Minister of the USSR, the Foreign Minister of China to name a few.
Before leaving Delhi, most of the VIP’s called on Sonia Gandhi at No.10 Janpath. I was present at many of the meetings. Sonia Gandhi’s world had been shattered. In public, she lost her composure only once. It was no ordinary grief. I distinctly remember Benazir telling Sonia Gandhi and her children that she should keep away from politics and look after her son and daughter after such a tragedy. Sonia Gandhi sat in silent sorrow. Her two children said this was not the time for such matters. Benazir again laboured the point. I then said to her that she had not followed what she was preaching. “You have stepped in the shoes of your father. The Gandhis have a tradition and legacy of serving India. They could not abandon their heritage.” Her response was, “these were seductive words” which avoided reality. This was no occasion to bandy words with her. The meeting ended on a sober note.
Several aspirants
After the Kings and Captains had departed, intense political activity became evident. The aspirants included the late Arjun Singh, N.D Tiwari, Sharad Pawar and Madhav Rao Scindia. Sonia Gandhi was aware of this. I told her that the time had come for her to indicate her preference for Congress president. He would naturally become Prime Minister. For so momentous a decision, I suggested she ask P.N. Haksar for advice. She said she would let me know. Meanwhile, she consulted several people, including M.L. Fotedar.
The next day, she asked me to bring P.N. Haksar to No.10 Janpath. Haksar’s advice was to offer the post to Vice-President Shankar Dayal Sharma. He suggested that Aruna Asaf Ali and I should sound out the Vice-President. Aruna Asaf Ali told the Vice-President that she and I had been asked to request him to accept the post of Congress party president. In other words, he would be the Prime Minister. Shankar Dayal Sharma gave us a patient hearing. He then said he was touched and honoured by Soniaji placing so much trust in him. What followed staggered Arunaji and me. The Vice-President continued, “The prime ministership of India is a full time job. My age and health would not let me to do justice to the most important office in the country. Kindly convey to Soniaji the reasons for my inability to take on such an awesome a responsibility”. His answer was wholly unexpected. To turn down the prime ministership of India was something only a man of self-confidence and integrity could do.
On the way back, Arunaji and I hardly exchanged a word, because Shankar Dayalji’s response had overwhelmed us.
We reported to Ms. Gandhi the Vice-President’s decision. The country was without a Prime Minister. Such a hiatus could not be prolonged. Already the media was reporting unseemly and not-so-innocent jockeying for the job. Once again she turned to P.N. Haksar, who advised her to send for P.V. Narasimha Rao. The rest is history.
(Natwar Singh is a former External Affairs Minister.)
In reponse to readers' queries, we are providing a link to P V Naraminha Rao's 1995 lecture 'Gandhi in the Global Village'
Keywords: Narasimha Rao, Congress, Indian politics





PVNR was a better candidate than the others (Arjun Singh, ND Tiwari, Sharad Pawar etc) mentioned by Natwar Singh. About Nehru whatever we read in our school books is not true a fraction of it is true, Patel would have been a better prime minister than JLN. We Indian should see the facts and mistakes of Nehru i.e. handling of Pakistan immediately after partition, Kashmir Issues, China war, foreign policies and relation with Russia/US, Tibet and so on.
PV Narasimha Rao could not get the credit he deserved... He had all the qualities of a PM, he was intellectual, visionary, excellent speaker, decision making capacity , avid reader and learner....He could understand economics and finance which rarely few PMs could do... India is fortunate not to have people like late Arjun Singh becoming PM of India... or N D Tiwari becoming PM.... Both leaders were undeserving...No comments on Sharad pawar or Scindhia... All the successive govt.s after PV followed the path set by him....
In this day and age when everybody in Delhi is after one position or other to learn that Vice-President Sankar Dayal Sharma had turned down the offer to be the PM of India is humbling and goes to show there are still some people left with integrity in the system though their numbers may be dwindling by the day.
Thank you, Narayana for putting the story in a broader historical context. Unlike its title, the op-ed does not seem to be about PVNR at all. A very misleading piece indeed.
Indeed it is interesting and very informative. really Natawarji u had
written in very lucid that what we can able to know about the politics
in exigency and importance for a country. Our loving PV had not made
history only but also he became an example for others who holds the top
responsible for our country.
Appreciate the comment of Dr. K.U. Mada.
Both the article by Sri. Natwarji and the comments make interesting reading. Every P.M. had /have their own personality reflected in the performance. But circumstances vary, so also the result. Decidedly, Pandit Nehru, P.v. Narasimha,Rao, Vajpayjee, Indira Gandhi, Morarji Desai deserve the place of extreme honour. At least now, apart from Nehru clan, the recognition of other people's contribution in Nation Building, is being talked about and brought out by a person having inside knowledge. I wish Sri. Natwarji writes his memoirs which will be reference book for students of history in future. But his view India was without P.M. at the time of RG's death is incorrect; only Congress Party was without President, a terrible loss, no doubt. The Nation moves on, men are just fleeting. Let us all make a sincere effort to do our bit for India's unique place in the annals of Universal Development, in our own way, whatever be our station in Life. India "ETERNAL, EVENTFUL, EVER-NEW".
It's an interesting article by Mr Natwar Singh. As a student of Indian politics, I know Mr Narasimha rao was a master of statecraft, but in the later years he also carried the stigma of corruption charges against him. Still, he was a much better politician than many others. Rao said to one Pakistani visitor over the Kashmir dispute: "Independence: No, autonomy: sky is the limit."
Very inetersting one!!!!!!
From this I could really understand that the yester year's politicians/advisors were very well concerned about the providing an apt person for the position.
Hats off to Shankar Dhayalji. You may not find such persons in politics these days. Many are so much attracted towards prime posts even in their late 80s age.
@Narayana .. Thank you for the post.. I read the article and was like HA!!! and was scratching my head as RG was killed during election campaign. Had Rajiv not been assassinated, Congress would have have got around 130-160 seats.. You are so right to correct Mr great diary and political historian Mr Natwar Singh and other readers. You are so true that there was a vacancy for the post of Congress president and Mr Chandra Sekhar would have anyways continued as PM until results and eventual govt formation. History would have taken totally different turn with No MMS has Rajiv being alive and PVN retired. Incidentally It was Rajiv who allowed makeshift temple and prayers at Babri .. as he was following his great Mother's communal agenda of please all .. Please minorities..
Three important things that comes out of this article.
1. Dynasty family power entrenched in Congress. Sonia Gandhi who was not active in politics & then a distant Indian of Italian origin had the power to be king maker & even today sadly, it is same in Congress. No leaders without blood connection. what a shame!
2. Selfless & patriotic politician do exist! hope we still have few left?!?! Salute SDS.
3. PVN, one of the most important PM of India who changed the path of India. changing lives of millions & millions of Indians by economic liberalization. Sadly, Congress dont like anyone other than the 1st family even if it is congress member to remember for their deeds (did we hear PVN 91st anniversary.
Thanks Mr. Natwar Singh for this candid eye opener of how we choose people for key positions.
Now letz get few facts right. When Rajeev was killed, India was NOT
without a PM. It is only Congress which was without its party
president.
India was in the midst of general elections At the time of Rajeev's
death, which was ironically forced by RGs withdrawal of suppport to
Chandrasekhar's govt.
Naturally, Chandrasekhar was the acting PM.
At that time, congress's victory was never a forgone conclusion. So it
was very wrong to assume that its president was the PM-in-waiting.
Even after RGs brutal killing and the enormous sympathy wave, Congress
could muster only 230-odd seats in elections. PVNR , at the time of
his being chosen as party president, was never projected as
P.Ministerial candidate. Things worked out in his favor only after
congress emerged as a single largest party.
Its sad to see that none of the readers could see though these facts.
Its more sad to see people in different online forums discussing this
distorted story without paying due attention to the history.
One does not understand the relevance of the article now. Any decision can be reviewed, rejected at a later date, because of the hindsight and the changed circumstances.Creation of Pakistan, Kashmir various economic plans are all matters that can have a re-look. But, if you can relive those circumstances, they may have to be upheld.It has become a fashion to criticise Nehru.He had pursued the Soviet line of thinking, as there was shortage of capital necessitating State initiatives. He could not trust the moneyed natives because of their closeness with the then British ruling class.Huge employment base was created our of the various heavy projects. Certainly, today within the globalised atmosphere, those policies look archaic. PVN acted as per the prevailing needs and liberalised to become a world player. Look at the revival from the days of pledging of our gold to rescue the country from ruins.Let us take history as it evolves. Great leaders,they were patriotic,passionate
Why Congress men say that its not a one family party. At that time Sonia
knew nothing abt politics yet she was allowed to take such important
decisions. Shame on congress...
Good that Mr. P.V. Narasimha Rao is recognized albeit belatedly. His political
leadership created the umbrella for Dr. Manmohan Singh to operate as Finance
Minister with the fullest support of the Prime Minister without which going in for
huge borrowing, devaluation, dispensing with the Directorate General of Technical
Development and other paraphernalia of the erstwhile licence and permit raj and
the banking reform. The two committees headed by Mr. M.Narasimham played
pioneering role in creating a more resilient banking and financial system which
proved to be forerunner for ushering in a capitalistic process of development since
the 1991. Rao's choice of Singh who had just returned from South-South after
relinquishing his post as its Secretary General was a master stroke without which
to get the best possible deals from the international institutions like the World
Bank would have more difficult. Choosing right man for the right job did the trick
that is worthy of emulation.
We all know PV was a great scholar and patriot. It is interesting that the author hints about the private life of PV, but not that of Nehru about whom also there were rumors. Also, as pointed out by others, it clearly shows how the Congress party has become dynastic party and most Congress people are subservient to this family.
This is an interesting post but there are two points worthy of
criticism.
a. Accuracy: While the overall thrust of the piece may be correct, it is not entirely accurate. A person of Natwar Singh's stature witnesses important events on a daily basis and possibly this might cloud a bit of detail. However, Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated in the midst of an election - at that time he was not yet the prime minister. All opinion polls indicated he was probably on his way to winning that election. After the election even while results were emerging, the news of PV being elected Congress president was reported almost live by Prannoy Roy on NDTV's election specials for DD. Thus, it was not correct that the nation was without a Prime Minister. The nation had a care-taker PM during the elections. b. No doubt PV is a great scholar and an able politician. However, perhaps Jawaharlal Nehru is a leader of different stature - any comparisons with him will inevitably be a bit contrived.
What Mr.Natwarsingh didn't mention was that while Nehru was a man of
idealism with his head in the clouds, Narasimha Rao was a level headed
'Down-to-earth' man with a clear vision to take pragmatic steps and who,
when it was expediently necessary, never failed to follow the
machiavellian cunningness to have his own ways. Who can forget his 'the
law will take it's course' pronouncements when his opponents were lying
in wait for staging an ambush on him when he was at sixes and sevens on
many an occasion?
Great ! I wonder why everyone is praising Natwar Singh. This article clearly shows how he is unashamed of his "chamchagiri" to the Gandhi family. What happened to the democratic process of selecting the next prime minister ? Just look at that sentence -"I told her to indicate her preference. He would naturally become the prime minister" to know what I meant. I am bewildered by all the positive praise for him in these comments. Maybe as Indian citizens, we ourselves are so used to dynastic pandering that we cannot think otherwise.
PV became a Prime Minister with Sonia's nod.
He was however an independent, self-respecting soul, who steered away from Sonia Gandhi and Licence Raj. His choice Manmohan Singh did a grand job as a Finance minister, as PV took upon himself the distractions of mundane politics.
Unlike Manmohan Singh, who has eternal pathological gratitude for Sonia Gandhi, and would do anything to please her, PV kept Sonia away for India's good.
To give the complete picture, PV wasn't a very clean politician, and Dr Manmohan Singh is a rare breed of an extremely clean academic entrusted with the job as Prime Minister and he would do miracles if those around him are as clean as him.
If any reader knows where to find a copy of PVN's speech mentioned in
the article: "India’s Cultural Influence on Western Europe since the Age
of Romanticism, given at Alpach, Austria on June 19, 1983" - grateful if
you let the rest of us know.
Can someone please provide the full text of “India’s Cultural Influence
on Western Europe since the Age of Romanticism” speech mentioned above ?
Anyway choice of PVN has proved that a nonNehru man also can be a good
Prime minister. Art of heading a minority government for full term,
brought the economy back on rail, the unsung pioneer of liberalisation,
anunassuming person - great, how many remember him? Many of the
available people's talents are untapped, and we are being served / ruled
by the same set of people in their late 70s and 80s. Old age people are
respected / considered only in Politics, and in higher posts in India,
not even in their families.
PVN Rao was a corrupt PM. He deposited 133 crore rupees in his son's account. This was a well known FERTILIZER SCAM done by him. India doesn't need such intellectuals who don't work for the benefit of the country.
When an ex-diplomat and central minister like Natwar Singh reminisces,
we have to take it with due respect. However, the narrative seems to
have some gloss added on by Natwar. For example, no visiting dignitary
like Benazir Bhutto would start counseling Sonia Gandhi at the height
of her tragedy whether she should dabble in politics. The type of
Natwar Singh's arguments certainly didn't suit the occasion and no one
would have time for such an interjection.
That the affairs of the leading national political party was conducted from the living room of one family speaks for itself. Sonia would have commanded more respect if she had suggested to let the party meet in the moment of sorrow and choose its leader in a democratic way.Despite the scholarly background of PV, his name sadly goes down in history as the one who followed 'ostrich-like policy' on Babri Masjid. A few MPs were blatantly bribed to defect under his watch.
Many political ills of today are legacies of Nehru and PV.
It was a fine gesture by SDS to turn down the offer which really offered the country one of the best prime minister in PVNarashima Rao to the post which he held forth with aplab. His contribution to the economy and saving the country from debt trap, opening up the economy is something no one can forget. Even the present PM Shri Manmonhan Singh has once commented that he cannot thing of working as Finance Minister under anybody else other than Narashima Rao. Such is his ability to identify talent and repose faith and allow them to do theri job effectively..
The article is yet another example of Congress party's obsession with dynastic rule. After all, what was the status of Sonia Gandhi in May 1991 other than being the wife of an ex-prime minister. Yet, it appears that Natwar Singh takes pride in acting as a 'messenger' in suggesting the names for P.M. post to Sonia Gandhi , who was literally a non-entity in Congress party then.It is no wonder that many Congress stalwarts with 50 plus years of political experience can not even suggest a name for the post of President of India in 2012 and leave the decision to supremo Sonia Gandhi.The country does not have any future until and unless dynastic worship is given up once for all .
Superb article. Natwarji, I love reading your articles that are replete with actual occurrences and movements. Really your career is an illustrious one. Your initiative to pen down every incident at the opportune time is indeed laudable.
A P.M. who did not face the Parliament even once has a memorial. One who served the full term and who brought in reforms but hailed from a state south of the Vindhyas has no memorial. Truly, there is no India south of the Vindhyas.
PV is one of the best PMs that India has ever had, probably among top 3.
Congress may have forgotten him as he doesn't have "Gandhi" in his name, but he is still in every indian's mind. Natwar ji, thanks for your article. I read the article that PV gave at UNESCO, its like a refresher on Mahatma. You are right that Nehru ji needed to discover India, where as PV doesn't need.
It is very difficult for anyone to understand how much PV has done to the country. India was miserably lagging behind the world in many aspects and he really managed to bring into back into the global political scenario. From 0 to 1. A B Vajpayeeji converted that 1 to 10. Now this UPA goverment made this 10 back to 1. Why Sonia is this much against PV. Because he served the nation and not her and her family!?
“The prime ministership of India is a full time job. My age and health would not let me to do justice to the most important office in the country. Kindly convey to Soniaji the reasons for my inability to take on such an awesome a responsibility”. - One fondly wish if the late Sh. Rajiv Gandhi too had such intelligence and understanding of one's own capabilities and inexperience, and gave way for those like PVN to be PM of India in the aftermath of Mrs. Indira Gandhi's assassination. Perhaps India would have been steered away from the License-Permit raj long ago and would have been much more advanced now. Tragically, Rajiv chose to be PM and in the process was surrounded by chamchas, hawks, sychophants and self-servinats. Yes... the rest is history!
I love reading Natwar Singh for the way he writes.I also like so much reading Khushwant Singh for the point of view and the way he weaves stories.But it is impossible to take most of their analysis by face value.To compare Nehru with PVN is the funniest thing that Natwar can ever do.To say that he did not have to discover India as an excuse for any intelectual output is a disingenuous excuse only Natwar can make.One just need to read the book 'Insider' to see the mediocrity of PVN Rao .The attempts by some to put him on an intelectual pedestal does not match with the actions of man.To say he was not saint is also downplaying the lack of vision, countless corruption scandals and petty politicking from which he never rose.
Hats off to THE HINDU for bringing out memorable events to remember penned by the forerunners in the scene.Natwarji brings to focus events leading to installation of P V Narasimha Rao as the PM of this great nation.Open expression of Shankar Dayal Sharma inability to occupy the exalted chair of PM reveals the greatness,foresightedness and physical sacrifice of a great scholar whose sound and voice vibrate the great central hall of arliament.India is proud of such leaders.Soniaji continues to be maker of destiny in Indian politics and remains so as revealed in "Turning Point" authored by Dr A P J Abdul Kalam.The word GANDHI invigorates and enthuses millions of Indian and even leaders like
Mandela and Obama.It symbolizes India and it's people.Custodian of the word and it's trustees are debated but the fact is Indira Priyadarshini was married to Firoz Gandhi and rechristianed as Indira Gandhi as the Indian custom of husbands first name tagged to wifes name.GANDHI is owned by India.
Shame on The Hindu for publishing such an article. The headline is
entirely misleading, and the author has taken the readers for complete
buffoons. That he has used someone as distinguished as late PM Mr. Rao
as a pivot to launch his sycophancy speaks volumes about his intentions
and character. It's a poor and shameless attempt to gain another stint
in the galleries of power, which he misused last time with no scruples
whatsoever. I feel cheated and sorry to have read this article.
The anecdote above is very interesting, but also shows how power in India is
concentrated in a few hands. That Sonia Gandhi was put in the position of
kingmaker is a reflection of the lack of democratic principles in the Congress party. It is no wonder that Congress and others are still stuck in the dynastic frame of mind, where the only qualifications required are those of birth.
Under these circumstances, one must laud S.D.S for having turned down the job of PM because he felt unable to do justice to it, and to PVR who was arguably the only half-way decent PM we've ever had.
I would appreciate Mr. Natwar singh for sharing such a good article
and his obedience towards the Gandhi`s.
For me it seems like, the mangoes are so tasty because they are from
our orchid. List of prime ministers Bharat had are one side and Mr PV
is on the other side. I always remember PV like my teacher who first
taught me the alphabets. It is good to appreciate such a great
personality for his own contributions on hi own. It would be nice to
point the decisions, but then it is up to the chosen person to deliver
what is has to.
Please appreciate the great personality who has introduced a another
great PM ( in person) Mr. Manmohan.
Dr Shankar Dayal Sharma might have declined the post of Prime Minister. But, when
he retired after his tenure as President, he was insisting that government should
provide a central air-conditioning plant for his retirement home than mere window
air-conditioners in its rooms.
Good article... brings back sad memories about Mr.Rajiv Gandhi, a good
man who will be missed for a long time in this Country.PVN was a master manager, bringing in Dr.Singh to save the economy was his great achievement.I think by this he opened a new vision and path to the Country which still plays a major role by Dr.Singh being the PM of the Country.
People who criticize Dr.Singh and Sonia Gandhi do not know how much they love and care about this Country and it's citizen all around the world. Would like to learn more from you Mr.Natwar Singh..plz keep it going.
As a country we have been obsessed way too much with the Gandhis. So much that we have ignored people who have had an equal or higher contribution. PV was one of the greatest minds. He steered India through one of the biggest economic crisis. He no doubt had his weak points. But as PM he is a better choice than many who have taken the seat after that. Glad some one in congress actually remembers him.
That is truly an interesting read about the events after the death of Rajiv Gandhi. It is shocking to read the greatness of Shankar Dayal Sharma, who should be a lot more popular given what he had done.
A very illuminating and beautifully written article by the Prince from Bharatpur on two of India's top and selfless leaders of India. The younger generation will do well to read the history of these two great sons of India.
The anecdote above is very interesting, but also shows how power in India is
concentrated in a few hands. That Sonia Gandhi was put in the position of
kingmaker is a reflection of the lack of democratic principles in the Congress
party. It is no wonder that Congress and others are still stuck in the dynastic frame
of mind, where the only qualifications required are those of birth.
Under these circumstances, one must laud S.D.S for having turned down the job of
PM because he felt unable to do justice to it, and to PVR who was arguably the only
half-way decent PM we've ever had.
I have great respect for the scholar mr Natwar Singh, but his comparison of the past two
titans did disturb me a lot. Jawaharlal Nehru did lay the foundation of the superstructure of
India for industrial and educational advancement of our land. Mr Rao on the other hand
Took the country in a different pathway by entering the global economy for economic
growth. Both the leaders had deep knowledge about india, and both did excellent home
Work on the needed development to suit the times. The view put forward by the esteemed
Scholar that Narasimha Rao, because of his spiritual background " did not need to discover
India" might be true. But his discovery that " The discovery of India, is a disarming
confession of his need discovering the land of his birth" is certainly not true. C.p.Chandra
Das, Coimbatore.
@mani sandilya - I am becoming your fan with each post of yours. KNS -
have the petro dollars vapourised?
A nicer and self effacing man one could seldom find. >> Really? Is
Natwar talking of Rajiv who abruptly dismissed A.P. Venkateswaran, Foreign Secretary or the way as a mere AICC secretary-general, insulted Andhra Chief Minister, T. Anjaiah? Please don't rewrite history to please Sonia and clan.
Natwar Singh is factually incorrect in stating the country was without
a prime minister. Chandrasekhar was then hale and hearty serving as
prime minister of India.
Assuming this version is completely true (sorry for being cynical), the country ought to be grateful to Sri PN Haksar who gave the best ever prime minister to this land. Historians across the board are now accepting that Narasimha Rao is the greatest leader India ever had, not Nehru, not Indira. He was the PM whom no one could bulldoze, whom no foreign power could bend, and who even fooled the US (about our nuclear program) when it was a hyper power.
I didnt understand the purpose of this article. Most people remember how PV Narsimha Rao and his son indulged in corruption and brought great shame to the whole of India.
It is a shame that Natwar Singh is even writing about him.
Instead breifing up,this could be more eloborate .This is a true inspiring story for the young and dynamic population of india
“You have stepped in the shoes of your father. The Gandhis have a
tradition and legacy of serving India. They could not abandon their
heritage.” Yes the real Gandhi, Mahatma's decedents, had that
privilege of carrying the torch but definitely not the clan which has
usurped the noble name for political expediency!
Reading between the lines Mr Natwar Singh is aiming for a post in the Government -- may be Vice President. Well done KNS! Shankar Dayal Sharma did a service to the nation by not accepting the PM's position. An ailing man cannot handle the pressures of the high office. His act was statemanlike. The dialogue with Ms Bhutto is more to please the first family than anything else. There have been countless families who have served the country without being in high office.
A very well written article on much forgotten PV. He is one of the four prime ministers, who will be remembered for ever for their leadership to the country. The other three are Nehru, Indira and Vajpayee. Though he was made Prime Minister at the instance of Sonia, he acted like a true leader of this country.
Dear Natwar Ji,
Your posts are really interesting and worth reading. Could you please post more often. Have you published collection of these articles as book?
Thank you for sharing what's going on/happened at high level offices
Please Email the Editor