Vishwaroopam ban

February 01, 2013 01:55 am | Updated 01:55 am IST

Films have been banned in States even after the censor board has cleared them. The board has no idea of the likely provocation a film may cause in a State, and how mob violence can worsen law and order. Only the Home Department of the State government, with its intelligence inputs, can decide on these things. That the Tamil Nadu government did not ban Vishwaroopam on mere apprehensions is amply borne out by incidents of violence in theatres that displayed the film’s banners.

If the police allow a crowd to gather and then stop the film, they will be blamed for not acting in time. If they use force against crowds resulting in some damage, will Kamal Haasan take responsibility? People will then say had the film been banned there would have been no violence. No one is saying Kamal Haasan should incur losses. The idea is to delay the film’s release, let the tempers cool, talk with Muslim groups and arrive at an amicable solution.

S. Pushpavanam,Tiruchi

I really wonder whether ours is a secular state. Why do we fear a movie? Are our religious convictions so weak that a film can affect them? Cinema is a popular art as well as an industry involving huge investment. Deferring the release of the movie will lead to huge monetary losses for the producer.

We don’t have pre-censorship for books or theatre performances. But for cinema, we have a censor board. Once it clears a film, it should be allowed to run. It is for those who see the film to decide whether it is good or not. It is not for a group of people or a few experts to decide how a person should apply his mind.

Aswathi Narayan,Alappuzha

Unfortunately, some vested interests have always threatened the creativity of artists. We should not give in to their pressure. It is the communal elements, not works of creative artists, which constitute a threat to our nation’s unity.

S. Navaneethan,Chennai

That an educated and experienced person like Kamal Hassan did not realise all these days that “secularism” in India means appeasing the minorities is surprising. Once the censor board clears a film, it should be allowed to be released. If not, why waste money on a censor board?

K.V. Rajan,Chennai

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.