The ‘Bystander’ effect

July 05, 2016 12:49 am | Updated 12:49 am IST

S. Swathi has left us and the agony of Swathi’s family cannot be forgotten in a hurry — the words “why did no one come to help our child... She was just allowed to bleed and let die” should haunt us. The unpardonable form of peoples’ behaviour at Nungambakkam station that day is called the “Bystander” effect, which is social behaviour by a person in a crowd expecting somebody else to do it with the result that nothing happens in the end. The term came into existence after the rape and murder of young Kitty Genovese in the U.S. in 1964. When she was murdered in her apartment, there were about 38 families who testified that they heard had her voice but none went to her rescue believing that somebody would take care of her. As a result, the killer accomplished his mission. Interestingly, her killer, Moseley, who was on death row, died a couple of months ago in a U.S. prison.

In the U.S., people remember her and take oath in her name promising to be the first respondents in times of distress. India needs to get over this syndrome.

S. Nagarajan,

Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.