Shocking

June 11, 2010 12:57 am | Updated 12:57 am IST

In view of the light sentence awarded to the accused in the Bhopal gas disaster case and the issue of compensation for the victims unsettled even 26 years after the disaster, the Centre's move to dilute the civil nuclear liability bill — by deleting the clause allowing American suppliers to be sued for damages in case of accident due to negligence on their part — is shocking. It reflects badly on the UPA government, which is buckling under American pressure. The opposition has a duty to expose the government's failure. If not now when is the question.

A.V. Narayanan,

Tiruchi

Diluting the civil nuclear liability bill in the backdrop of the Bhopal tragedy verdict, which anyway is a travesty of justice, adds insult to injury. The U.S. has shown double standards by heavily penalising BP for the oil spill disaster but, at the same time, not helping India get justice for the thousands of victims of the Bhopal gas disaster. The government would do well to learn a lesson or two about the U.S.

Rahul Jain,

New Delhi

Prevention is better than cure — this is what we are expected to learn from the turn of events in the Bhopal disaster case. But the nuclear bill has put a big question mark on this belief. Is it not the government's duty to ensure the safety of its citizens?

Bhuvana Subramanian,

Tuticorin

The nuclear liability bill looks not only ridiculous but also insensitive, especially after the judgment in the Bhopal disaster case. The report that the government has sought to dilute the bill under American pressure establishes the extent to which our elected representatives can go to satisfy the so-called global headman.

Kasim Sait,

Chennai

The Bhopal verdict has restarted the debate on the importance of the nuclear liability bill. One lesson that the government must learn is that the liability of the operator in case of an accident at a nuclear reactor, especially due to negligence, cannot be pre-determined. An accident at a nuclear reactor may have such long-term ramifications that a pre-determined amount may not be sufficient to mitigate the damage.

Ujjwal Khatoniar,

Jodhpur

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.