Security state

August 06, 2013 04:34 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:20 pm IST

While it is no one’s case that we should become a “national security state” (Aug. 3), the internal and external security situation is not as simple as the writer makes it appear. Insurgency in Kashmir and the north-east may be on the decline but the absence of violence does not imply the presence of peace. If Maoists are “finding the going tough,” it is because of our security personnel. The challenge from China needs to be met effectively. And then there is the ever-present threat of terror attacks.

All this requires a strengthening of our armed forces and intelligence agencies, without compromising on civil liberties.

Nitish Aggarwala,

Ghaziabad

The article plays down the internal security threat. Maoists are not only becoming bolder but are also expanding their range of operations and linking up with insurgent groups in the north-east. The threat is very much real and rising. That said, efforts to combat it must involve greater public and parliamentary discussions, rather than secretive and unilateral action by the Centre.

Akash S. Goud,

New Delhi

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.