Politics of small States

April 29, 2016 01:36 am | Updated 01:36 am IST

While analysing the politics of three small States — Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand — with Indian federalism looming large in the backdrop. Neera Chandhoke (April 28) seems to be moving slowly from realism to idealism. Unfortunately, the politics of idealism which, as a beacon, threw light into every dark corner of Indian society, almost got extinguished at the dawn of Independence. The idealist Indian politician of yore is now extinct. When she writes about “the fight against injustice”, “struggle against exploitation”, “demand for control over resources by tribal communities”, the reader is forced to revisit the theory of ‘internal colonialism’. In being critical about “State leaders who have shown great willingness to play into the hands of the Central government,” we are, in a way, disregarding the significance that national political parties have in the Indian federal system. Finally, representative democracy has been compromised enormously not only in India, but across the world also.

K.C. Sreekumar,Thiruvananthapuram

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.