OROP issues

November 07, 2016 12:09 am | Updated December 02, 2016 01:53 pm IST

The recent statement by Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley blaming “administrative lapse” by a bank in connection with OROP for a veteran is hard to accept (“ >Lapse of bank: Jaitley ”, Nov.5) . Are not banks a part of the financial set-up of the government? There are instances where I — as Member (Legal), Armed Forces Medical, Dental and Veterinary Officers’ & Family Pensioners’ Association — have referred extant government orders of some veterans and their family pensioners to the grievance cells of various ministries and subordinate offices including banking ombudsmen regarding non-revision of pension. The responses, in most cases, have been akin to passing the buck. The Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension) in one instance wrote to the bank advising it to to pay the family pension of an army captain (of about Rs.11,000) when the pensioner was a naval captain (equivalent to an army colonel) and eligible for an amount of around Rs.21,000. The ministries appear reluctant to investigate the matter. What is the use of approaching the higher-ups?

G. Kameswara Rao,

Secunderabad

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.