No Hyderabad blues

September 18, 2016 11:33 pm | Updated November 01, 2016 07:22 pm IST

The writer (“No Hyderabad blues”, Sept.15) did not quantify the benefits of the special package, announced for Andhra Pradesh. Citing the examples of Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand, which were created on the demand of local people, he conveniently forgets that these two States were truncated ones and did not lose anything in the bargain. Never in Indian history has a residual State been left without the capital city, which was built and developed with funds from coastal Andhra. It is a very special and extraordinary case. Even after bifurcation, the State has got only a pittance.

Maradapu Srinivasa Rao,

Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.