Matter of shame

April 03, 2013 11:59 pm | Updated November 13, 2021 11:21 am IST

Many young army recruits work in their superiors’ homes as dog handlers and gardeners, wash clothes, polish shoes, and do the work of not just the officer but his entire family. As for the argument that officers have to use the services of sahayaks at home because of security reasons (Letters, March 27), how is it that the officers of the Navy and the Air Force do not employ sahayaks ?

An Army friend of mine once told me that he was a personal assistant to an officer. But I came to know from another friend that he was doing sahayak duty. He did not want his family to know this. I hope the proposal to replace sahayaks with civilian personnel has not been shelved.

K.B. Rajendra,

Belgaum

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.