Judicial activism

August 08, 2012 01:46 am | Updated 01:46 am IST

I do not agree that over the years the social action dimension of public interest litigation has been diluted (“Disturbing trends in judicial activism,” Aug. 6). Do not omissions/commissions of the public authorities constitute social action? The Supreme Court’s directions on emissions, ragging, etc., have immensely benefited people. Probes were ordered in many scams, including the 2G, only because of the court’s intervention. In rushing to court to redress a grievance against a public authority, citizens may be digressing from their responsibility of making legislators and the executive responsible for their actions. But what faster and effective mode does the common man have?

B. Harish,

New Delhi

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.