India’s abstention

March 29, 2014 01:28 am | Updated May 19, 2016 12:24 pm IST

India’s decision to abstain from voting on the U.S.-sponsored resolution in the >UNHRC against Sri Lanka reflects New Delhi’s balancing act between Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka. One must appreciate the fact that India acquired the moral courage to abstain from voting. Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s statement that resolution hampers reconciliation is unconvincing.

Nothing can be more atrocious than speaking for reconciliation without dispensing justice; justice is a deep human need and forms part of the glue that holds society together.

Velpula Ramanujam ,

New Delhi

Any defence of India’s abstention reflects the lack of a steady foreign policy bereft of political considerations and coalition party pressures. India has been doing a flip-flop from its stands in 2012 and 2013. As a formidable Asian country, India should have a more steady and issue-based approach in its foreign policy, especially towards its neighbours. It should not cave in under either internal or external pressures.

Mohan Daniel ,

Thiruvananthapuram

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.