Generic words

September 26, 2012 12:23 am | Updated 12:23 am IST

The decision taken by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Numbers and Names, Icann, to sanction generic top level domains to corporates who emerge successful in a competitive bidding process is retrograde (editorial, Sept. 25). No doubt, the move will lead to a monopoly in the digital world. Considering its negative impact on ensuring a level playing field in digital commerce, Icann must not proceed with this until all legitimate concerns that have been raised are addressed convincingly.

M. Jeyaram,

Sholavandan

The internet is already segmented as key players, Apple and Google, have built barriers and created their own ecosystems So, the impending decisions on generic top level domain names (gTLD) such as “.book” or “.beauty” should not be given to individual corporations as it will disadvantage smaller players. Certainly, having a “.google” or “.amazon” as gTLD is different from “.search” or a “.book.” To create a better experience, an option before Icann would be to expand domains and put up a regulatory structure for the new generic TLD in a way similar to how a handful of generics such as “.com” or “.org” are handled today.

Varad Seshadri,

Sunnyvale, CA

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.