Continuing impasse

September 12, 2009 02:57 am | Updated November 17, 2021 06:53 am IST

The rigid attitude of the management and of the striking pilots of Jet Airways had led to a stalemate, which is regrettable. The delay in negotiations has not only caused huge losses for the airline but also created a lot of inconvenience to passengers. The suggestion given by Congress MP Sanjay Nirupam that Jet Airways be nationalised is no solution, as the national carrier itself is in a deep crisis.

Ankit Kumar,

Ghaziabad

***

When the national air carrier Indian is unable to cope with pressure and is looking up to the government for help to keep itself going, how can Mr. Nirupam call for the nationalisation of a private airline? At a time when we are gradually moving towards greater privatisation, the demand is neither logical nor economical.

R. Gurumurthy,

Chennai

***

If the pilots of Jet Airways have caused hardship to passengers by striking work, the other airline companies are fishing in troubled waters by hiking the airfares steeply. This has added to the passengers’ woes.

S. Nallasivan,

Tirunelveli

***

I was appalled on reading that the other airlines hiked their ticket fares in the wake of the cancellation of flights by Jet Airways. It reminds me of the autorickshaw drivers of Chennai who fleece the people whenever the public transport system is disrupted.

R. Vasudevan,

Chennai

***

The sudden strike by Jet Airways pilots has affected the passengers seriously. There are reports that the airfare from Mumbai to Chennai shot up to Rs.20,000 at one point. The pilots should have at least given some advance notice for the people to make alternative arrangements.

Easwar Raghunathan,

Mumbai

***

It is true that the passengers who had booked their tickets on Jet Airways were put to a lot of inconvenience on account of the strike by the pilots. But who is responsible for the strike? How can the management sack two pilots for forming an association — the National Aviators Guild — when the Supreme Court has held in the B.R. Singh case that it is a democratic right? The industrial law declares that it is an unfair labour practice for employers to prevent employees from forming trade unions. It has also been made a penal offence.

The authorities should, therefore, see to it that the employers first follow the law by withdrawing the illegal dismissals, allow the employees to form an association and negotiate with them. Bilateralism is the basic principle of industrial democracy as pointed out by V.R. Krishna Iyer.

N.G.R. Prasad,

Chennai

***

Pilots draw huge salaries and perquisites. What is the need for them to unionise? They are not working in some industrial unit, drawing modest salaries. Are the pilots aware of the immense harm they have caused to the people and the profession they serve?

H.N. Ramakrishna,

Bangalore

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.