Autonomy and the CBI

August 22, 2013 12:10 am | Updated April 21, 2017 06:01 pm IST

The constitutional state of the CBI continues to mirror our loss of faith in our legislators (editorial page, “A charter for the CBI,” Aug.21). They seem to craftily handle any tide that turns against them by getting together and eventually coming out with unanimous amendments.

Joseph Kamalesh,Gedilam

One of the arguments of Mr. Noorani in placing the onus on politicians seems flawed — his example of Morarji Desai. Morarji Desai cannot be held responsible for the fault of Jamshid Nagarvalla. Nagarvalla was under no obligation to seek permission from the Home Minister if he was sure of his actions. In reality, the executives prefer to work as political stooges in order to gain favour from politicians, who in turn use them for their personal tasks. Instead of acts being passed, what we need is action. Acts and charters only exist on paper.

Krishna Chandra Misra,New Delhi

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.