In such a pogrom unheard of in any civilised society, it is a great surprise that the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (May 10), entrusted with the job of probing incidents and fixing responsibility, is attempting to exonerate almost all allegedly involved in the pogrom. Has the SIT let the cat out of its bag?
Tharcius S. Fernando, Chennai
The report reads like an argument by counsel representing the Gujarat Chief Minister.
G. Radhakrishnan, Thiruvananthapuram
Keywords: Gujarat riots
The comments on ACTION - REACTION by by Annadurai Jeeva are very
important and meaningful.Yes Jeeva is 100% correct.There is no end to
such ACTION-REACTION process,if we do not respect human values.There is
nothing greater than humanity.I bow my head in front of Mr A Jeeva and
others those who support humanity, not community.
SIT is correct as they have given explanation for everything. How one can point to some one if they are not the culprit. Just because everyone says so?
Sir,
I find it extrememly amusing to find many persons deriding the SIT report on Modi. The incessant efforts by a section of the media and a handful of bigoted personalities to damn the SIT report is akin to mocking the indian judiciary, which, for all its faults, have time and again withstood political interference. There was a major hue and cry, when Laloo Prasad Yadav's self-appointed Shah commission, 'convicted' Modi, very conveniently releasing it's preliminary report a few days before the Bihar assembly elections and then releasing its final verdict a few days before the Lok sabha elections - and received a telling-off by the Supreme Court. Now, if the Supreme Court exonerates Modi, let us sit back, retrospect and apologise to the poor chap - for harassing the man for a decade, while privately acknowledging him as India finest Chief Minister.
The job of the SIT was to investigate if Modi was involved or not. SIT has found that Modi was not involved. Let the courts decide if Modi was involved or not.
Please Email the Editor