Aamir Khan's views

May 24, 2012 01:36 am | Updated July 11, 2016 08:10 pm IST

I wish to respond to the letter of Lalitha Ramakrishnan (May 23). One need not be an authority to comment on a social issue. Pray who is an authority on marriage? A priest? Anyone can express an opinion. As a parent of a daughter and son, if I have an opportunity to spend money at the time of their marriage on, say, giving them a house or car, instead of spending it on extravagance, I will be very happy. I don't know if such spending is dowry or a commitment. If I don't give my children anything, how can I expect them to look after my expenses when I am old?

K. Mohanraj,

Karaikal

One need not be an authority on marriage to express his opinion. Readers would like to know the views and opinions of different sections. What is wrong with Aamir Khan's views? Every day, we see poor families spend beyond their means on their daughters' marriages either at the insistence of the bridegroom's family or on their own. Electricity, food, etc., are wasted. A lot of money is spent on extravagant decorations. What is wrong in suggesting that money thus spent be saved for the usefulness of the newly married?

V.M. Jayapal,

Kaveripatnam

Aamir's attempt to spread awareness among the masses is laudable. He should continue his work with perseverance. He should persuade Bollywood and the media not to hype celebrity weddings. Celebrities should stop giving details of how many crores they spent on their jewellery, costume and so on. They should opt for low-key ceremonies and say no to dowry.

Elham Fatma,

Aligarh

Dowry bashing seems to be in fashion once again. I am not justifying the practice but I would advocate a sober look at it. There is no question of dowry in a love marriage — the minute dowry is discussed, it transforms into an arranged marriage. Most demands for dowry are not out of greed for wealth but necessitated by circumstance.

In high society, matrimonial alliances are promoted knowing well that companies and estates will change hands without any mention of dowry. Dowry is generated by the giver — he wants an IAS officer for his daughter. He is not willing to make do with a bus conductor or porter who does not demand dowry.

Vallioor K. Vydhianathan & V. Visalakshi,

Hyderabad

Though Aamir Khan is not a journalist or analyst, the points he has made are valid. Giving the money meant for extravagant weddings to the bride to kick-start her married life is not another form of dowry because it is not done by force.

We should take the positives from Aamir's column rather than criticise him because he is an actor and earns a lot of money.

R.V.K. Saketh,

Visakhapatnam

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.