Faculty salaries are key to attracting the best and the brightest to academe.
Salaries and the terms of faculty appointments and promotion are central to the well-being of the academic profession and its contributions to the university. If salaries are inadequate, the “best and brightest” will not be attracted to academe, and those who do teach will be obliged to moonlight, diverting their attention and dedication from their academic work. Additionally, without appropriate contracts and appointments, there is a limited guarantee of academic freedom or expectation of either a stable or satisfying career. Furthermore, in a globalised world, salaries in one country affect academe elsewhere, as professors are tempted to move where remuneration and working conditions are best.
Yet, only limited research is available about these issues, within a specific country or comparatively. Comparative studies on academics in many countries are complex, as data are often difficult to obtain; and exchange rates and the standard of living vary across countries. The research provided data using purchasing power parity, which permits more realistic salary comparisons. The project reveals key trends in 28 diverse countries on all continents.
Salaries and remuneration
This research, not surprisingly, found significant variations in academic salaries worldwide. As a general rule, salaries were best in wealthier countries, although there are significant variations among them, with the English-speaking academic systems generally paying more than those in continental Europe. Russia and the former Soviet states pay quite low salaries, even when their economies are relatively prosperous. There were a few surprises. India ranks comparatively high in salaries. China, on the other hand, has invested heavily in its higher education system, particularly in its research universities; yet average academic salaries rank at the bottom.
It was also learned that, in many countries, salary alone does not convey a complete picture of compensation. Academics also depend on other payments and subsidies, from their universities, and other sources — to make up the total remuneration package. Chinese universities, for example, provide a complex set of fringe benefits and extra payments to their academic staff for publishing articles, evaluating extra examinations, and for other campus work. In North America and western Europe, salaries are the main academic income — while elsewhere this does not seem to be the case.
In many countries, salaries are too low to support a middle-class life style locally, and other income is needed. In many of these places, moonlighting is common. Many academics teach at more than one institution. Indeed, the burgeoning private higher education sector in many countries depends on professors from the public universities to teach most classes.
Contracts
The terms and conditions of academic appointments and subsequent opportunities for advancement available to the academic profession are also of central importance. Among the group of 28 countries, few offer a formal tenure to the academic profession, thus perhaps weakening guarantees of academic freedom and providing less job security. Tenure arrangements, awarded to academics after a careful evaluation of performance, seem largely limited to the United States, Canada, Australia, the Netherlands, and South Africa in the study. In one country, Saudi Arabia, local academic staff receive permanent appointments at the time of hiring. Some continental European countries provide civil service status to academics in the public universities, and this also provides significant job security. In fact, in most countries, few are fired and few are seriously evaluated. There is a kind of de facto tenure that provides long-term employment for most, without either a guarantee or any means of careful evaluation.
A number of important variations exist in requirements to enter the profession or (when available) to qualify for a tenured-like position. In many countries, a doctoral degree is requisite to become a university professor. In certain European countries (Czech Republic, France, Germany, Russia) a habilitation — similar to a doctoral dissertation — is needed, in addition to the doctoral degree, to achieve the rank of professor. In other countries, a simple bachelor's degree is sufficient to be hired as a university teacher. In countries where a PhD is not required, there is a trend to demand higher qualifications; and the master's degree is becoming the minimum requirement, even if it is not mandatory by law.
International mobility
Among the countries that pay the best salaries, there are some that benefit from an inflow of academics from less-wealthy countries. Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, and the United States benefit the most from the migration of academic talent. In contrast, many of the countries paying the lowest salaries are considered “sender” countries and some (Armenia, Ethiopia, Israel and Nigeria) have implemented programmes, in which better salaries and working conditions are part of the strategy to attract or retain national and international scholars. In their quest to build world-class education systems, China and Saudi Arabia are aggressively pursuing international faculty, mostly from English-speaking countries, as well as their own expatriates. In the Chinese case, it has resulted in a big gap between the salary of local professors and international/repatriated ones. Finally, there are countries that are both “senders” and “receivers.” For example, South Africa attracts professors from other African nations, but at the same time it frequently suffers brain drain to English-speaking countries — such as, the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States.
Conclusion
This research shows a range of realities for the academic profession. Some countries offer reasonable salaries and secure and transparent career structures for academics. The English-speaking countries included in this research — Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, to some extent South Africa, and the U.S. — fall into this category. Western European countries that offer civil service status to academics typically provide decent working conditions and compensation. But even in these nations, the professoriate is inadequately compensated when compared to other highly educated professionals. For the rest, and this includes Russia and the former Soviet Union, China, Latin America (except Brazil), and Nigeria, salaries are low and contracts often lack transparency. India offers reasonably good salaries.
A global comparison presents an array of realities — few of them extraordinarily attractive — for the professoriate. This situation, at least for the 28 countries examined in this research, is certainly problematical for countries at the centre of the global knowledge economy. For academics in those countries with quite low salaries — such as China, Russia, Armenia or Ethiopia — the academic profession faces a crisis. In general, it seems like professors are not considered the elite in the knowledge economy. Rather, they tend to be seen as a part of the skilled labour force that such economy requires.
(Philip G. Altbach is Monan University Professor and director of the Center for International Higher Education at Boston College. Iván F. Pacheco is research assistant at the CIHE.)
Keywords: academic profession, academic staff salaries, salary comparisons, academic staff, professors




Though a comprehensive guidelines have been conferred by the UGC on educational qualification for the appointment of various categories in Colleges/Universities,the precise rules to be adopted for fixing seniority for the promotional posts should also have been categorically furnished to redress certain confrontation arises then and there.However the UGC has recommended the pay scales and other pecuniary advantages and the same is implemented in toto or pruning certain aspects in some states, the UGC and the enforcing authorities concerned should also circumspect as to whether their recommendations are being implemented properly.Certain regulations which do not conform with certain colleges and universities of some states ought to be reconsidered to pave a congenial ambience for the incumbent to render their noble service with contentment.
Government is trying hard to fill the gap between the poor's aspiration
and rich's monopoly. If professors ,teachers salaries are not hiked ,if they don't feel they are socially valued in the society than a day will come when people will think many times before deciding to walk into teaching job. Education in our country is not a philanthropic thing its of-course have become a earning job.
The article highlights the true plight of Professors in India. The government has increased the salaries with the sixth pay commisison but there is no proper body to strictly administer and govern if it is being implemented in Universities. There are various loop holes which are cited and academician are paid lesser. The UGC, AICTE and other governing bodies are totally toothless and dead. They show as though they are taking action only after media highlights and other that that these universities are all run by politicians and so they have muscle power to twist any individual who raises questions. The total number of Government Unviersities are very less in number compared to the demand. So Academicians who come into this profession are ladies who feel bored at home and male who are retired and want a relaxing job without much stress. So what is lost is the Quality of Education for the next Generation. This will indirectly affect the next gen of the country.
Though a comprehensive guidelines have been conferred by the UGC on educational qualification for the appointment of various categories in Colleges/Universities,the precise rules to be adopted for fixing seniority for the promotional posts also should have been categorically furnished to redress certain confrontation arises then and there.However the UGC has recommended the pay scales and other pecuniary advantages and the same is implemented in toto or pruning certain aspects , the UGC and the enforcing authorities concerned should also circumspect as to whether their recommendations are being implemented properly.Certain regulations which do not confront with the prevailing certain colleges and universities of some states ought to be reconsidered to pave a congenial ambience for the incumbent to render their noble service with contentment.
.The esteemed writers have spoken the truth about the salary of professors in India. The Position is the same with teachers at the primary , middle and secondary level. By payment Of salary alone, the teachers may not become committed. It depends upon the attitude of people towards the the etching profession. This rule applies to all professions, in all parts of the globe.At 82 now, I still remember with gratitude, the inputs given to me by certain Teachers from the kindergarden level to the law college level. Ezhuthachen, chandrasekara kurup, vancheeswara iyer, sivadas menon, Alexander gnanamuthu, pro.Krishamurthi, father d' Souza , PROFESSOR KV Venkata Subramanya iyer. They were Giants in the teaching field. All of them had the inner urge to givev all knowledge to the Student community. To them SHARING OF KNOWLEDGE WAS NOT PROPORTIONAL TO THE SALARY RECEVED.Their commitment had no boundaries. I prostrate before them. C.P.Chandra Das, Former Vg Professor, IITMadras from USA.
It is one of most important threat the India facing now is that the lack of efficient and dedicated teachers,priest,lawyers and leaders.
Good remuneration is a prerequisite of good performance of a teacher; however, it may not be possible to ensure that all well paid university professors deliver good performance as teachers and guides. I have heard disturbing accounts of professors in universities in USA who change jobs and put their students who are doing research for Ph D. in difficulties. In India the complete job security has made college teachers very complacent. There are fewer and fewer good teachers in colleges and universities here despite increase in remuneration awarded by the Sixth pay Commission. There is so much talent in the corporate world but practically there is no shift to teaching jobs from this sector as appointments of ‘outsiders’ are resented by the existing professors in the colleges and universities. Thus our universities need to pay adequately but at the same time review their policies so that the best talent from outside joins the teaching profession.
I beg to differ with the author. High salaries are not enough to attract brightest minds to teaching profession unless we do away with the thinking that teaching is a career option of losers, of good for nothing people.Few suggestions I would like to make; to attract best talents in teaching profession:
1.Performance based appraisals should be given rather than experience based so as to make teaching an appealing profession.
2.Conducive environment should be created where people choose teaching by choice and not by chance. This can only be done by a shift in the thinking.
3.Universities should be free from political interference and infrastructure should be provided for R & D so the professors need not to move to industry for practical exposure.
The article, however, in spite of being a good overview, fails to address the inequalities within the disciplines- the growing rift between Natural Sciences and Humanities.
Secondly, it sees the faculty members merely in the light of statistical variables, and fails to rope in the 'quality of life' factor, which cannot be merely understood in terms of standard of life, which mostly represents material needs of life. E.g. where the English speaking so called First World countries offer higher salaries and transparent hiring conditions, we need to ask ourselves, "at what cost" is this being offered? To what extent the academic market at these places is possessed with the notion of "academic production"? And to what extent is this pressure cooker situation producing research mediocrity?
Lastly, ideology and teacher-student relationship are equally imp. aspects. Many brilliant professors have consciously and happily decided to stay with indigenous universities with lower prospects.
In order to produce world-class research, it is important to pay well not just to the professors but also to the students and post-docs, who do the most amount of the actual research work.
Many brilliant Indian students are emigrating to western countries because of ridiculously low pay in the top research institutes such as the IITs. These same students produce first-class research when they are in top American universities. I am not saying that all the Indian students should return to India. Infact, it is good that so many are going abroad (this includes myself). But in a country of 1 billion+ people, some quality students are bound to remain in India.
And they have to be lured into research institutes with **world-class** pay. Otherwise, they will just join MBAs or work as software professionals. This is a severe opportunity cost to India.
Salary is just one point. There are many other reasons as to why teaching is not a lucrative profession.
1. Spineless and toothless UGC/AICTE committees who do not take action against institutes that do not conform to the guidelines. Money works everywhere.
2. Reservation system for teachers posts.
3. Useless UGC/AICTE norms for teachers qualifications. They value only degrees, teaching skills are least expected. There are only a handful of teachers who earn higher qualification to gain knowledge and become better. For majority of teachers degrees are only to fulfill the criteria for promotion and salary hikes.
4. No corporate like structure where one can climb up the ladders by sheer show of talent and skills. (Again degrees play a blocking role here).
5. Too much workload on teachers other than actual teaching job. The passion for teaching loses here itself.
6. Majority of educational institutes do not respect good teachers.
In spite of drawing the best salary the Indian professors are not able to impart the quality education and set up the highest standards expected of from them. Inequality in payment and service conditions between the guest lecturers and the permanent lecturers is increasing. Has UGC ever thought about the consequences before coming up with such an abnormal pay hike? What impact does it have upon the society?Teaching fraternity?
Of course salary plays a great role in attracting good quality
professor. But there should be some provision of sufficient incentive
to the professor if he/she is working harder than other faculty
member in teaching and projects. Actually what happens is that even
if the person knows things but still he/she doesn't want to work hard
thinking that it will not affect their salary.
There should be respect for quality of teaching.
The main concern is not about salary or packages. It is about the quality of professors that are engaged in prestigious organization like IIT, IIM, NITs, Govt Colleges. Indian govt. should draft a policy just like in MNC, to review the performance of professors. It would attract the talented youth intellectuals to join these institutes and grab teaching as a profession.
Surprising to find India offers high salaries in the survey. Highly untrue, to be honest. A B.E. student can be sure to earn more than an assistant professor. Consultant opportunities are few and far between. The institutes gobble a big fraction of the consultancy fees even otherwise. There is no effort on the part of the universities to woo its alumni who have graduated with a PhD from top US colleges.
Now for one positive: the ISB of late has emerged as a bright spot in the Indian academia. Recruitment is based on merit and the salary packages are rewarding, and an efficient tenure system is in place. Hope the IITs, IIMs, NITs and Anna Univeristy take notice!
The present UGC salaries are quite good, at least outside the metros. Many people get high salaries which they don't deserve.
Many of the points presented are true. The quality of professors determine the direction of the organization. Even in prestagious organizations like IIT, NIT, IIM, ISI etc., the quality of the professors is coming down. When you compare the quality with western universities, most young professors do not even come to close. The main reason the lack of good sponsorships and lack of policies which attract talent.
Salaries definitely play a very big important role. Bachelor student who just passed out of the college and who has just has 5% knowledge of what professor gets same pay. Students do not even give second thought about research. Unlike westren countries, most of the times research is towards theory, which again drives away bright students. Some of the European professors make money from consulting, however Indian professors has to pay a hefty %age to college and lot of taxes. I think UGC and colleges have to lot of soulsearching.
Salary is not the only incentive to reduce the brain drain.Even the
facilities provided to the faculty and the encouragement and
appreciation in the research work they do and nominating them for the
international conferences and paper presentations would help them in
excelling in their field.
I respect the fact that teacher is the most valuable link of our society but at the other end they are not loyal to their profession. They didn't deliver their 100% in the class room that leads a student to private coaching centers where the same teacher is ready to give his 110%. Along with their salary hike our govt. should frame some policies that can attract the one that love ones job.
While it is significant to ensure that teaching as a profession gains
respect and remuneration is one aspect of it, there is also a need to
talk about accountability here. We need to dwell upon,the impact of
non-teaching commitments like research projects, writing books and
papers have on teaching capability and responsibility of the academic.
Is teaching taking a back seat since monetary needs and other more
challenging researches become a priority? How much dedicated time are
Professors, particularly in India able to give to their doctoral
students? In most Universities there is a system of assessing the
Professor and his teaching techniques by the students. In India,
except may be for the IITs, such system does not prevail anywhere
else. How can the teaching community, particularly at the University
level be held accountable for their work? These are significant
questions and require a debate to make this profession a noble one.
Good remuneration is a prerequisite of good performance of a teacher but it is never possible to ensure that all well paid university professors would deliver good performance as teachers and guides. I have heard disturbing accounts of professors in universities in USA who change jobs and put their students who are doing research for Ph D. in difficulties. In India the complete job security has made college teachers very complacent. There are fewer and fewer good teachers in colleges and universities here despite increase in remuneration awarded by the Sixth pay Commission. There is so much talent in the corporate world but practically there is no shift to teaching jobs from this sector as appointments of ‘outsiders’ are resented by the existing professors in the colleges and universities. Thus our universities need to pay adequately but at the same review their policies so that the best talent from outside joins the teaching profession
The UGC norms also should be updated regularly.
Good colleges and schools should conduct campus interviews in the same way various large companies do.
We have to talk about Indian conditions. Now the salary of Professors,
Government employees are good in our country. It is easily forgotten
that just to meet UGC norms many people aquire degrees based on
ordinary, useless subjects and this has become more of a ritual. Like
most of the Project work being done for Engineering and other fields,
this has become a routine. Majority of the graduates are not qualified
for employment it is reported. If the quality of the professors are
good, students standard also would have been better. I was able to
recall only few of my professors, not all; whereas some of the
lecturers, we may still remember. In earlier days, the school teachers
were very good in everything. At that time, it was only service/
livelihood and not a profession to make money.In India like
judiciary, teaching is a good profession and are well paid.
Salary crisis for the professor and academic lecturers is posing a
serious problem for the academic world. Depth and the feel of teaching
by the teacher is loosing day by day. They are becoming more
professional yet. All these problems may arose due to low salary
stucture.
Salary is just one of the problems.
More serious is the lack of academic environment, infrastructure and basic facilities. Service conditions. No respect for merit and interference by petty politicians. Even second and third rate academics seem to keep away!
It is necessary for the education structure to respect its professors and teachers. One way of doing is to provide a good salary structure, along with other facilities. These professors are responsible for making a ground base for knowledge base economy. But most of the time,led by the wave of the brain drain they are allured towards the countries with better pay structure and facilities. To protect your knowledge base and to encourage more and more youngsters for joining the research it is necessary to maintain a good pay scale for professors.
Please Email the Editor