Not so healthy

August 13, 2010 11:24 pm | Updated 11:24 pm IST

A recent dispute between general insurance companies and certain categories of health-care providers has snowballed into a major controversy calling into question the relevance of health insurance for meeting medical expenses. Over a month ago, the four public sector general insurance companies, who collectively hold a majority of health insurance policies, decided to withdraw “cashless” facilities offered by them either directly or through third-party administrators (TPAs). Initially projected as a marketing tool, the cashless option is now a common feature in all health insurance policies. Since the insurance companies undertake to settle the bills directly, the policyholder is spared the burden of making the payment upfront and then getting it reimbursed, a tedious process in the best of times. The number of network hospitals, those that participate in the scheme through a contractual relationship, has increased enormously, aided substantially by the cashless facilities on offer. Health insurance has become the fastest growing segment of general insurance — it registered, on average, an annual growth of 35 per cent over the last decade. With less than 10 per cent of the eligible population covered so far, there is obviously a great potential to be tapped.

Given this context, the withdrawal of the most popular feature of health insurance plans is a setback for not only the policyholders but also, in a larger sense, the orderly growth of the health insurance business. The insurers have alleged that the network hospitals, in collusion with doctors, inflate the bills that are settled by the TPAs under the cashless scheme. Health-care providers are largely unregulated, and there are no standard treatment protocols, no benchmarks of costs to be charged, and no standardised data maintenance. Insurers complain that the present business model is becoming unviable with loss ratios running in excess of 120 per cent. The public sector insurance companies are trying to provide some of the benefits of the cashless policies through a newly created category of preferred provider-network of hospitals with agreed payment schedules for standardised treatments. On the other side, the leading hospitals have their own reasons to offer: the cost of health care, like everything else, is rising, and in the course of treating the patients they cannot stint on tests and procedures that could turn out to be expensive. Policyholders and insurance companies as well as hospitals and doctors would all be better off if a greater degree of transparency is introduced in health insurance.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.