Manmohan Singh’s visit to Japan holds out the hope that the two countries have turned the corner of a somewhat underperforming relationship. An agreement towards a civilian nuclear deal still looks some distance away. But the decision by the Prime Minister and his Japanese counterpart Shinzo Abe to “accelerate” negotiations towards this, though below New Delhi’s expectations for a definite timeline, shows Tokyo remains interested despite domestic public opposition to nuclear energy and its export, especially to a non-signatory of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Japan’s commercial motivations are quite obvious. Component vendors like Toshiba, Mitsubishi and Hitachi are keen to find new markets abroad after Japan’s own decision to drastically cut its reliance on nuclear energy in the wake of the 2011 Fukushima disaster. Both sides have also agreed to set up a joint working group to discuss modalities for the sale to India of the US-2 amphibian aircraft, which is being used by the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force, as its navy is called. This is the first time Japan is reconsidering its post-World War II self-imposed ban on the sale of defence equipment to another country, though the plan could well be to sell it to India as a civilian aircraft. The two Prime Ministers were appreciative of the expanding defence relations between the two countries. The Indian Navy and the JMSDF held their first bilateral exercise off the coast of Japan last year. These exercises are to become a regular feature.
The strategic dialogue between the two countries includes a regular exchange between the defence ministers of both countries, a “two plus two” dialogue involving the foreign and defence secretaries of both countries, a dialogue specifically on maritime security, besides a U.S.-Japan-India trilateral dialogue. While both sides are keen to lift their relations to the next level, New Delhi needs to guard against allowing ties with Japan to get underpinned by the shared wariness of Beijing. There is nothing to be gained for India, Japan or China in a polarised Asia. Tokyo has been large-hearted in its infrastructure development assistance to India, which it has now promised to expand. But despite the two sides talking up their “natural” partnership and their synergies, India’s trade with Japan is at a measly $17.5 billion, and the 2011 Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement has not yet delivered its promise of trade in goods and services. This aspect of the relationship — rather than the purely ‘strategic’ pivot that certain lobbies in both countries are promoting — needs much more attention than it is getting now.
Keywords: PM Manmohan Singh, Japan visit, Indo-Japan relationship, Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force



















To counter the western monopoly of dominance in every field, Asian
countries should make collective efforts to maximize their economic
benefits and arose their bargaining margin in world politics
continuously.
India Japan Partnership is one of the welcome steps in this regard.
While the title captures the sense the editorial wants to convey, this
very title - Love In Tokyo -was used for the editorial of yesterday's
Loksatta, a Marathi daily from the Express Group.
Editorial says everything except the most important one in the current
aspect, i.e. the counter ring fencing of china from east and west.
Your editorial, though objective, falters when it comes to China. India cannot circumscribe its relationships with other countries just because China might feel weary about them. Let us not forget that China has sustained Pakistan as its paw against India, trying to contain India within the South Asian box, even by going to the extent of supplying that country with nuclear weapons and their various delivery systems. China has never bothered about Indian sensitivities in constructing a 'string of pearls' around India stretching from Nepal and Bangladesh through Burma, Sri Lanka, and Maldives to Gwadar in Pakistan. It has de-facto recognized POK as part of Pakistan by officially hosting POK and Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Ministers. China remains the only P-5 member not to support India's candidature for UNSC. It has on two occasions, 2006 & 2008, blocked India's request to include LeT's Hafiz Saeed under UNSC Resolution 1267. Your statement on Chinese sensitivities is totally unwarranted.
Japan has always been a benign friend of India. India provides market
for Japanese products whereas India stand to gain on technological
front. Good relation between both the countries is necessary in wake of
notorious Chinese activities in the region. Any agreement in the nuclear
front will take the relationship to a new heights.
The headline is superb and nostalgic too. There is no reason for not having special relationship with Japan so far despite a lot of congruence on many matters. India has to learn a lot of work culture and skills while Japan can learn whatever good they want. This special bond of friendship has nothing to do with our relations with neighbours, especially China. The time has come for Asian nations to become a conglomerate and help each other, sort out their problems amicably across table with candid talk of no war but peace.
Please Email the Editor