The mystique that stock markets seem to hold for lay people and policymakers alike gets magnified several times over in budget season. There is, most certainly, no rational basis for this. Though devoid of real significance, the share markets’ verdict on the budget in the minutes and hours after the Finance Minister’s speech continues to be extremely important to policymakers. This has been amply demonstrated again by the urgency shown by P. Chidambaram and his team in allaying concerns over a provision in the Finance Bill that seems to cast doubts on the validity of residency certificates that benefit investors routing their investments through tax treaty centres such as Mauritius. On budget day, the sharp decline in share indices was attributed to just this single provision. The fact that the concerns are confined to foreign investors and tax havens used by them says it all. The broader market and the government are explicitly acknowledging the importance of these investors. It is, therefore, not surprising that in his budget speech, the Finance Minister gave his proposals relating to the broad category of foreign investors pride of place among financial sector announcements. None of them — and virtually none of the financial sector announcements — made reference to financial outlays but are nevertheless important for the policy direction they reveal.
In moving towards internationally accepted definitions of foreign institutional investment (FII) and foreign direct investment (FDI), the government is facilitating larger foreign inflows especially in sectors that have an FDI cap. Foreign investors may not have got their entire wish list. The much-anticipated announcement to expand the role of FIIs in the debt market did not materialise. But the package for them looks very impressive when contrasted with what is available for domestic investors, especially the retail ones. There has been once again a proposal to simplify the procedures for small and medium enterprises to access their dedicated exchange. More significant, in the context of infrastructure funding, is the proposal to start a dedicated debt segment in the stock exchanges. The facilities being accorded to foreign capital can be justified in the current macroeconomic context of the widening current account deficit. Yet the economy needs domestic investors too, not just the large ones but retail investors, who should ideally be the backbone of any well developed capital market. The ambitious disinvestment target next year, of Rs.40,000 crore, brooks no delay in enhancing the retail participation in the markets.
Keywords: P. Chidambaram, Union Budget 2013-14, CPI (M) reaction, oil subsidies


What happened to mexico after introducing FDI in 90's??
It din't produce even mediocre economic growth.
FDI is a double headed monster which can be devastating if it is not
dealt properly.
INDIA currently try to grow only capital account in BOP and regularly
ignore current account specially balance of trade(BOT).india being able
to balance, balance of payment only due to capital account surplus
otherwise our CAD deficit in 2010-11 was worst then 1991 were india
pleading own gold to take loan from IMF.india started many initiatve to
grow our export but how it is working currently its such a huge
question mark.let us take a example of SEZ,in india 585 sez (china has
only 5)but our export to world is only 1.6%(china -more than 10%).a lot
of tax plus labour low relaxation given by gov. to sez but result is
not at par all sez converted in to real state.Our economy survey claim
we have 295 billion dollar forex reserves but its nature is really
volatile be have to work on goods export and non visible trade.
In the present capitalist system grabbing investment foreign or
domestic is the first choiceless step of growth.The escape excuse of
governments world wide today is that investment is not coming
naturally but only via allurement of better protection,better sops and
no questions raised about how and where this booty came
from.Investment process qualifies only the foreign investments with
calibration per minute reflected in the share market.Once the process
qualifies the horse of growth fails to jump.Why ? We must revisit the
1/03/2013 cartoon of The Hindu showing FM with Budget briefcase on the
growth horse which is half toy and half real.Connected base of this
horse was static as a toy. Employees/stakeholders are treated as
static in a toy horse that gives a false feeling of a real horse ride
to the hidden stakeholders.To take successful leap of growth the horse
of delvelopment needs to 100% real and well connected to all
stakeholders.
Why no one is commenting on the reluctance or silence of Chidambaram on bringing back the black money from foreign banks which would have contributed a lot in fixing the CAD, and only FDI is being talked as the only solution. Mr Narasimhan of HINDU also may comment about it or government is silent because it will hurt all the powers that be.
Foreign Institutional Investments do have dual sides. The uncertainty of their entry and exit have harmful effects at times. Depending largely on hot money should be minimized.
Too much of reading into stock market reactions to the budget proposals is undesirable. I found to my dismay that alongside the telecasting alive of the FM speech was the graphical depiction of the stock market reactions real time. Also the statement by the FM in his speech that there no options to our accepting or rejecting FDI perplexed the people. Does it mean that any and every FDI should flow to India. An instance in the past is necessary to be stated here. Even when things were good, our government granted –forgetting the corporate crime of 25 years ago of the Bhopal gas tragedy-an FDI project of doubtful merit was given. The tainted Dow Chemicals got the sanction, for of all things to start a project in Pune to research in poisonous gases and chemicals. But for the agitation of the local Warli farmers the project –which was secretly and hurriedly being constructed –would have gone through, There is a study of several lakhs of aid projects in the three decades 1970-2000 w
India's increasing dependence on hot money to fund its CAD is a matter of concern.
Please Email the Editor