Everything in the seven-minute action-packed entry sequence, starting with the spacecraft hurtling in at over 21,000 km per hour and ending with the six-wheeled robotic rover being lowered by nylon cords to the surface of Mars, went just as planned. Back on the home planet, controllers and mission staff assembled at the famed Jet Propulsion Laboratory in the U.S. jumped up in elation and celebrated when word came through in the form of radio signals that Curiosity, as the rover is called, had indeed landed safely. Soon afterwards, the first grainy picture taken by a camera on the rover came through. The plan is for the car-sized rover to spend the next two years trundling about, looking for indications that Mars could, at least in the past, have supported life. Humans have long been excited by ideas of life that might exist on the neighbouring planet. In the early years of the last century, it was thought that intelligent beings there had constructed a network of irrigation channels. From that, with a bit more imagination, ‘Little Green Men’, who might have designs on Earth, emerged.
But in the years since then, it has become clear that Martians, if they indeed existed, would be microscopic and microbial, rather than the swashbuckling sort found in science fiction. Spacecraft that surveyed Mars from orbit and earlier rovers that wandered its surface have found convincing evidence that although the planet is now dry, liquid water once existed on its surface. Where there is water, there could have been life. Curiosity has been put down in the Gale Crater, which appears to have once held a large body of water. The rover’s instruments will look for more evidence of water and how the environment in the crater changed over time. It will study whether other ingredients needed to support life, such as key chemical elements and sources of energy, were present. If organic molecules are discovered, that might suggest life had existed, assuming that non-biological origins could be ruled out. Perhaps the most exciting possibility is finding unmistakable indications that life in some form still survives somewhere on the planet. India’s Mars mission, which was recently cleared by the Cabinet and is scheduled to be launched at the end of next year, should be able to contribute to such a search by scrutinising the planet’s atmosphere from orbit. There may be methane in the atmosphere, which could have a biological origin. The next logical step in the exploration of Mars will be to bring rock and soil samples back to Earth for detailed analysis. Such an ambitious and costly effort could well be an international one. Only then will the issue of life on that planet be finally settled.
Keywords: NASA Mars mission, Curiosity, Mars rover, Jet Propulsion Laboratory


NASA's successful endeavor of Curiosity beams back not only the
blurred and unclear images of the Mars surface but also a far sighted
forthcoming truth of our blue planet the Earth. From orbital survey
and invention we are having knowledge that the Mars is now dry which
implicates that earlier there was water indicative of existence of
life on the red planet in past.This piece of information is alarming
to us that the way we are exploiting the natural and environmental
resources without caring for sustainability will certainly land our
green planet into lifeless one.
Indians have failed to master the cryogenic engine technology. ISRO will beg Americans and Russians to get technology for its future missions and then claim as indigenous development. This is the eternal hypocrisy of Indian scientists while fizzling tax payers money. The Antrix Deva deal shows the real face of ISRO.
If the government has extra money to spend,it should utilise it to address the mega problem of poverty in the country rather than on exploring the surface of Mars. The well-to-do will definitely applaud the Mars mission of the ISRO. As for the poor,they wouldn't even know what is happening to have an opinion about it.
The editorial elaborates on the NASA mission to Mars. It also makes a mention about the Indian programme to Mars. Just compare the 1 Tonne mass rovercraft on the surface of Mars with the 20kg payload in orbit around Mars. Why is it necessary to fly a kite? Is it because we have only the PSLV to launch any payload? What are the objectives of this 20kg kite flying exercise by ISRO? What are our priorities for the DOS?
The editorial "In pursuit of life" made very interesting reading. The opening sentences were so precise and well-chosen that they gave the readers the thrill that would have been otherwise exclusive to those who took part in the mission to Mars. A lead has also been succinctly provided on the possible revelations the present mission make, after its thorough probe, about the existence of life on Mars. To be frank, the editorial was quite enlightening too.
Please Email the Editor