The Planning Commission must not make the mistake of letting short-term fiscal concerns overturn the national aspiration for Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Some elements of the draft Twelfth Plan on health have caused alarm, as they run counter to key recommendations of the Commission’s own High Level Expert Group. The Plan panel wants to reduce out-of-pocket spending on health from 71 per cent to 50 per cent during the Plan period, to mitigate the biggest factor that leads to impoverishment of many families. But that will be impossible without substantial fiscal support. Regrettably, there appears to be a quiet attempt to peg targeted public spending on health at 1.58 per cent of GDP, ignoring the HLEG recommendation for an increase to 2.5 per cent over five years, and to 3 per cent by 2022. Among comparable nations, India brings up the rear in public spending on health at 1.2 per cent of GDP. It is now crucial for the Centre and the States to come together and launch a UHC model funded by general taxation that meets the essential health requirements of all people. The success of legal reform in the United States to regulate a socially disconnected, for-profit health industry, and the remarkable equity achieved by other welfare-oriented countries should persuade Indian leaders on launching a national plan.
At the polio summit in February, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh emphasised the need to strengthen public health systems, and accelerate efforts to achieve universal access to care. It would defeat this idea if UHC were to rely on for-profit providers of care and insurance under a ‘managed care’ model. The Planning Commission would do well to steer away from the siren songs of corporatisation, and focus on the core challenge: the need to set up an independent regulatory framework at the national and State level for all types of care institutions, regulate drugs to lower costs and promote generics, identify standard treatment and management guidelines, and provide resources to fund the essential health package. It is of course encouraging that the Commission has distanced itself from reports of reliance on corporate providers, but it is essential to state the vision clearly in the Plan. Also worth pointing out is the potential of UHC to create a large number of jobs and spur economic growth. India needs many more professionals to achieve the ideal norm of one doctor for 1,000 people, and three nurses and midwives per doctor. Here, the HLEG provides a useful roadmap for expansion of teaching institutions, which can quickly raise the capacity of many remote hospitals.
Keywords: Universal Health Coverage, government health care, healthcare policy, Planning Commission, 12th Plan



Looking at the government steps towards reducing the health budget from 71 to 50 % would proved to be detrimental .It cannot be justifiable to all section of society since majority of the Indian population lies in BPL line ,and cannot be ensured that it will ensue to major section of the socity .There are many other sectors whose budget can be narrowed down rather than looking on a fragile sector where country has poor ranking.
To achieve universal welfare of masses,it is essential to harness demographic dividend india is experiencing till now.To provide cheap, timely and regular health services ,it is a must to enhance quality of human resources. Thus,government should spent at least three percent of GDP on health and related services without failure.
The govt can easily more than double the funds available for PROPER health care, without need to spend more overall, by abolishing aberrations like homoeopathy, ayurveda, unani, naturopathy and acupuncture. This step will have the added benefit of drastically reducing the exodus of qualified doctors to USA and other countries: because one of the major causes of such "brain drain" is the fact that, in the face of cut-throat competition from these cheap but useless "alternatives", most doctors cannot earn enough for a decent living.
The UHC can become a reality only if health services are affordable and
accessible to all irrespective of which class or section of the society
they belong to. But, the lowering down on proportion of 'health budget'
in the plan period is disheartening. Herein, as National Health Mission
aims at, employing AYUSH doctors where MBBS ones are not available is a
progressive step forth. In a bigger picture, if one sees all the govt.
policies look 'seminal' but the kind of implementation makes it a
success or a failure.
There is need to spend more prolifically in the Health Sector.Many
people are deprived of adequate medicine due to their spiraling
prices.There was a good move earlier at the starting of year by
reducing the price of cancer drugs which are too expensive to bear
even for middle class forget the indigent ones's, but it would have
been better if the Govt. would have made it free of cost rather than
slashing the price.More and more medicine should be made free and the
supply of free medicine in the needy areas should be under checked to
ensure it is being supplied to the necessitous rather then being sold
off by the corrupt department which is given the fund and
responsibility to carry out the task.
We should advocate self-reliance in this country not more dependence on the govt.No more, more of the same please.
(1) Without ensuring that there are enough doctors and support staff in our Primary Health Care (PHC) centres, universal health coverage (UHC) would remain a dream. (2) We have assumed that private medical colleges which have been opened in very large numbers in many places, often with diluted norms, would increase the availability of trained doctors in PHCs. This has not happened because those who qualify as medical practitioners are mostly from urban areas and have very little urge to set up health care facilities in rural areas. (3) Hence, we must review medical education policies to ensure that new medical graduates are trained especially for work in PHCs. A proper work environment in PHCs and decent remuneration policies would definitely ensure that there is no shortage of medical and support staff in PHCs. (4) Mobile mini- hospitals and well equipped dispensaries which provide healthcare facilities in rural areas would make UHC a reality.
If we don't stop the spending of the Planning Commission(PC) will
drive our country to bankruptcy just like in 1991.If we don't shut
down the PC we have not only have health consequences but it will also
have economic consequences.We don't have unlimited credit in the
country and when the PC spends that money it denies that money for the
private industry and our growth sectors cannot expand and employ more
people due to lack of credit.So our PC is also responsible for our
unemployment and social unrest in our country.PC spending under mines
our growth sector and also results in more bureaucracy and undermines
health care and pushes more people into poverty because of
unemployment problems.
If the planning commission has become a corporate to promote private corporates in this sector then we are moving away from humanity and welfare to commercial syndrome.Delivery of this service is surely possible by the government.There are countries that have proved the same.The fiscal support by the government in the health sector is imperative duty and responsibility and let us not deviate, and shirk away.Please do not give the commercial color in the plan as it always works against the principle of equity.Why private players to earn huge profits Through strengthening public system the vision of UHC shall be achieved through very many tools available with the government such as taxation,fund,budgetary allocations,insurance etc.Expenditure control through regulations and protocol for treatment,generic medicines etc will definitely help us to reach the goal of universal health for all.Service to humanity is service to God.The collective wisdom should focus this principle to achieve it
Emerging factors tending to confirm the lurking fear that the Planning Commission might commit the grievous mistake of letting short-term fiscal concerns upset the national aspiration for Universal Health Coverage, the well-timed and well-intentioned editorial "Don't take the wrong pill" assumes great significance. It has succinctly summed up what the people stand to gain by proper implementation of the scheme and what they stand to lose by not earmarking adequate funds for it. For the government and the Planning Commission,it has served sumptuous food for thought.
Please Email the Editor