Another round to Pakistan military

November 22, 2011 12:33 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:08 pm IST

‘Memogate', the fresh controversy that has enmeshed the democratic government in Pakistan, is yet another round in the strained relations between the civilian dispensation and the military. As before, the Pakistan Army has come out on top. The crisis was set off when a dubious Pakistani-American businessman claimed he had carried a memo from President Asif Ali Zardari to Admiral Mike Mullen, who was then chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, asking for U.S. help to prevent a military takeover in the wake of the Osama bin Laden raid in Abbottabad. Pakistan's Ambassador in Washington, Hussain Haqqani, is said to be the person who drafted and handed over the memo to the businessman. If true, why the businessman entrusted with a top secret mission should have chosen to go public with it, of all places, in a write-up in Financial Times , itself raises many questions. That President Zardari and Mr. Haqqani should have thought a coup was in the air after the May 1 fiasco for the Pakistan Army is no less intriguing: in retrospect, there has been no worse moment for the Pakistan Army in recent times, and no better time for the civilian government vis-à-vis the military. The real story behind this episode may not come out for quite a while. But its immediate fallout is likely to be the replacement of Mr. Haqqani. The Pakistan Army sees him as an irritant in its relations with the U.S. He was blamed for clauses in the Kerry-Lugar legislation that made U.S. aid to Pakistan conditional on the Pakistan Army's good behaviour. He is also blamed for not being combative enough with Washington and for compromising national sovereignty in bilateral dealings. His likely departure will be a political loss for President Zardari. The military will no doubt have a say in appointing Mr. Haqqani's successor.

That this controversy has erupted around the same time as the rise of the former cricketing hero, Imran Khan, in Pakistan's political firmament may be no more than a coincidence. It is believed that one reason why the Pakistan Army has not acted against the Pakistan People's Party government despite its extremely frayed relations with President Zardari is that this would mean putting its institutional weight behind Nawaz Sharif, whom it distrusts even more (the feeling being mutual). Although it is premature to talk of an Army-backed caretaker government under Mr. Imran Khan, at the very least the cricket superstar is now counted among the available alternatives. Throw into this Admiral Mullen's confirmation of receipt of the controversial memo, thus compromising the PPP government, and one can see that ‘Memogate' is much more than the sum of its parts. None of this is good news for democracy in Pakistan.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.